PaddleWise by thread

From: <wanewman_at_uswest.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] Paul Caffyn and the Skeg vs. Rudder Holy War
Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 13:33:06 -0500
How recent was his article?  My understanding is that he
first explored the skeg vs. rudder option during is
circumnavigation of Australia.  The skeg was the so called
integral-skeg on his Nordkapp HM which was just a big fin
shaped keel built into the hull design for the rear 1/3 of
the boat, it was not one of those little strap-on skegs.
The HM hull stays in the water pretty well in rough
conditions but unlike most modern skeg boats it is not
adjustable.  Anyone who has paddled  the old Nordkapp HM
knows that although it tracks well and does not weather
cock, it can be a really SOB to turn into the wind in gale
conditions.  The fin is so extreme that the boat turns
downwind, not up in a strong cross wind which can be just as
annoying as a boat that weather cocks..

Perhaps Paul would be less inclined to paddle with a rudder
if he had tryed the adjustable skegs, perhaps not.  Just
because one expert paddler prefers one way of paddling does
not make it the right way.  There are plenty of expert
paddlers that paddle well with skegs and there are plenty of
experts who paddle with rudders.  I personally don't feel
the need for some experts endorsement of my preference in
kayak style.

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Alex Ferguson <a.ferguson_at_chem.canterbury.ac.nz>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Paul Caffyn and the Skeg vs. Rudder Holy War
Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 09:05:19 +1200
At 01:33 pm 9/05/00 -0500, you wrote:
>How recent was his article?

I think I've seen this article quite a while back.

>  My understanding is that he
>first explored the skeg vs. rudder option during is
>circumnavigation of Australia.

All the trips round New Zealand were with a "slip-on" skeg.

>The skeg was the so called
>integral-skeg on his Nordkapp HM which was just a big fin
>shaped keel built into the hull design for the rear 1/3 of
>the boat,

True and this is what has been particially cut off and rudder fitted.

(I was ducking under this boat and all his others on the way to the toilet
a couple of weeks ago).

>Perhaps Paul would be less inclined to paddle with a rudder
>if he had tryed the adjustable skegs, perhaps not.

The article as I read it is in response to those who say you are not a sea
kayaker if you have a rudder. Yes, it is preferences (to some extent) and
that the rudder option is very viable.


>Just
>because one expert paddler prefers one way of paddling does
>not make it the right way.  

No.

>I personally don't feel
>the need for some experts endorsement of my preference in
>kayak style.

But there are some people who do.

Alex
.
.
Alex (Sandy) Ferguson
Chemistry Department
University of Canterbury
New Zealand
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:13 PDT