Jackie wrote: [snip] > In some places (don't know about your area) one measure a property > owner has for protecting themselves from losing their property to civil > lawsuit in case a tresspasser becomes injured on their property is to > post it with "No Tresspassing" signs. This is exactly right. I know plenty of people who put up no trespassing signs solely because the absence of them can be relevant in any liability determination. It's unfortunate. I have resisted putting up the signs myself, and most of my neighbors along the coast have, as well (obnoxious vacation home owners that they are <g>). The signs themselves deface the nature beauty of the place, but some people do feel the need to have them. There is an old trail that runs along the coast from Rockland to Rockport -- or at least it used to run that distance -- which crosses my property and that of lots of other people. For the fairly nice stretch from Rockport out a couple of miles, I know of only two people who have put up no trespassing signs. In one case, I believe it was for liability reasons, and folks do walk the trail across that piece. In other case, it is my understanding that the owner really does not want people to walk the property. It's sad, because the trail is very beautiful. There is also a Nature Conservancy piece nearby where the trail can be accessed (legally -- there is even a trailhead marker with maps) from the road. I have found it pleasing to see that so many of the "vacation home owners" along the stretch have no objection to keeping the trail open to those who wish to walk along the shore. If you land your kayak here, it can be a nice stroll. Mark *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sat Jul 08 2000 - 07:27:38 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:27 PDT