> serious licensing would put canoe (probably kayak too) > rental operations and the like out of business? > > Dirk Barends I'm not so sure. Auto licensing hasn't put auto rental places out of business. Although obviously it would cut down dramatically on the "tourist/ un-planned/ spur-of-the-moment" type rentals. But somehow I think that might not be all bad. In general, as I mentioned before, (assuming we get past the notion of licensing at all) I think levels of licensing would be appropriate. For example, Canoe/Flatwater Level: could be obtained by simply passing a short test regarding the use of safety gear and demonstrating an ability to control the boat. (This test could be administered by a rental company, which would have certain responsibilities under the law by virtue of being licensed to administer the test and grant such license.) Kayak/Open Water: could be obtained by demonstrating the above plus an ability to do a wet exit and re-entry, both assisted and unassisted, plus perhaps some other rescue and communications skills. Etc. Regarding the several comments that certain incidents would not have been avoided by a mandatory licensing system -- of course they wouldn't have. Licensing can't stop stupidity. In general, I don't think it should ever be assumed that a law will completely "stop" the offending conduct. Laws against murder have never stopped people from killing people. Laws do have some deterrent effect. But there are at least two other important purposes of laws: (1) to express a collective view of the community -- such as: the community abhors people killing people, or: the community is concerned that boaters be sufficiently skilled to avoid hurting themselves and imposing a cost on the community. And (2) to create a system whereby those who offend our community values can be "punished" in some way -- such as: those who murder go to prison for a long time; or: those who fail to observe our standards for the operation of boats will be fined, or possibly even denied the right to operate boats, either for a period of time, or forever (depending on the offense). Laws against drunk driving don't stop drunk driving, really. But those who repeatedly offend will have their license taken away, and at least that says that we, as a community, don't want them driving. Also, they can then be arrested for driving. All in all, I think one has to recognize the functions of laws, and to acknowledge that they are not a perfect solution, but just one of the only ones we have. Just a couple of thoughts from the peanut gallery. . . Mark *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Jul 27 2000 - 07:54:05 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:29 PDT