Re: [Paddlewise] accident scenerio

From: B00jum! <snark_at_tulgey.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 17:07:13 -0400 (EDT)
Mark writes:
 > On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Tina wrote:
 > 
 > > What troubles me most about Mark's unfortunate accident is the fact that he
 > > was paddling a 14+ foot touring kayak  on a class 3 - 4, 825 cfs, rocky
 > > whitewater river. When queried, he responded that he'd taken it on class 2
 > 
 > i also paddle it with some regularity on class III rivers ;-)

I think its entirely possible to take a longer boat down class III
rivers. After all the early WW boats were *much* long than they are
now.  It would IMHO, be dependent on *which* class III, what boat and
how well you can handle it.

 > > rivers,  and his friends paddled the same boats through the Grand Canyon,
 > > (8,000 to 40,000+ cubic feet/ second).
 > 
 > from the website for this boat:
 > 
 > <snip>
 > 
 > > <snip: ww vs. sea/touring kayaks: eg. tracking vs. maneuver, etc..>
 > 
 > don't confuse "touring" with "sea kayak" ;-)
 >  
 > > I've heard several sea kayak on ww river disaster stories over the years,
 > > (a Folbot totalled on a class 2 run,  Boy Scouts badly bashing up a troop
 > > of borrowed glass sea kayaks on the Deschutes), but haven't heard any
 > > successes. Is this a common practice in some areas?
 > > Tina

Tina, I don't think you hear about success stories as often since that 
isn't 'news'.  I do think that taking a longer kayak down a river
takes more caution than say river rafting.  Its probably about the
same class of caution that a WW paddler takes though.

 > again, it is mainly a matter of semantics, but in colorado, where there is
 > an extreme variety of water available to paddle, we recognize 3-4 types of
 > kayak, recreational [kiwi's etc], whitewater [sub 12 footers], touring
 > [12-16 ft], andd sea kayaks [16 foot+] ... the prijon yukon expedition is
 > an extremely popular boat in colorado.

I'm also given to understand that in Colorado (esp on the mighty
Colorado River) a different scale is used for river class.  Around
here (Oregon), I was taught the Class I-VI system (VI being by
definition unrunnable).  Often this gets broken down into II+, III+ or
IV-. 

So - is that true Mark?  Are you using a Class I-X scale to describe
the river you where running?  If so, it all makes more sense.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
snark_at_tulgey.org     aka Glen Acord	  http://www.tulgey.org/~snark
	if ($snark eq "boojum") {vanish("softly","suddenly")}



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Fri Aug 11 2000 - 14:09:15 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:30 PDT