Bill Hansen writes: > Boojum writes...<recommended care for puncture wounds is sterile > water, preferably with some level of pressure > > > What's used medically is sterile saline solution. Water is hypo-osmolar, and Is that to say that sterile water is *very* osmotic, meaning it is likely to permeate the tissues and thus dilute the existing (good) fluid? > therefore is pretty hard on tissues, especially damaged ones. Large volumes In what way is it hard on tissues? > of sterile saline - several liters - are used to irrigate wounds, with some > moderate pressure. Most commercially made irrigation systems include a > pulsatile component, which helps to flush out debris. Bill, This is great info. > Sterile water irrigant might be better than no irrigation at all, especially > if the original wound was "dirty" in some way and formal medical help is > more than a couple of hours away. Using sterile water is the general advice I remember from my Wilderness Medical training [note I say 'what I remember, as opposed to 'what they taught me' 8]. And yes, this is for a back country scenario where your not going to get ambulance level care for more than a few hours. > In a field situation, sterile "saline" can be made by adding a couple of > teaspoons of ordinary table salt to a liter (or a quart) of sterile water > and then boiling for at least 5 minutes. Let it cool in the container in > which it was boiled and then slosh it into the wound. Deep irrigation and > pressure irrigation wouldn't be possible in this situation, but some > cleansing would occur, which will probably be helpful. If you had a [clean] plastic hypo, why wouldn't [moderate] pressure irrigation be possible? A question on saline solution - By adding salt and thus 'salinating' the water, does it make the water less osmotic? Is the goal to prevent the liquid from rapidly permeating the wound? > I agree with those who have written that irrigation with antiseptic is not > good, since antiseptics will damage tissues. I have a similar aversion to > the ubiquitous "antibiotic creams". What a victory of marketing over science > those are! The antibiotics in them only reach the surface of the "cream", so > they can't penetrate into the damaged tissues. Worse yet, most of these > "creams" are actually petrolatum-based ointments, not creams at all. That > is, they're grease, and they seal a wound, which is just what you don't > want. Still, I realize that people are going to use them, just because > they're marketed so heavily. Even doctors who should know better use them. > Most of the time they (the antibiotic creams) don't do actual harm. Thanks for the note on antiseptics/antibiotic creams. Is there ever a case where antibiotic (or a specific antibiotic) cream is useful? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- snark_at_tulgey.org aka Glen Acord http://www.tulgey.org/~snark if ($snark eq "boojum") {vanish("softly","suddenly")} *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon Aug 14 2000 - 09:59:14 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:30 PDT