Dave wrote: (SNIP) > > Once the wave breaks, the situation alters as the rotational motion of the > > water molecules changes to translational motion which can cause a capsizing > > moment proportional to the righting arm of the boat. Note the term righting > > arm rather than righting moment. Righting moment is the product of the > > righting arm and displacement and acts to orient the boat to the surface. > > The righting arm is a function of the boat's shape and center of gravity > > without consideration for displacement. Of two boats with the same righting > > arm, the heavier will have more stability or righting moment. > > Not following you here, John. Are you thinking of a **fully broken** wave, > which pushes a wall of soup horizontally towards the paddler? I don't think > that's what you mean. As soon as the wave breaks the rotational motion in the top of the wave breaks down and becomes translational. Once the motion of the boat becomes translational gravity acts "normally" (i.e. as on a surfer) and the boat begins to plunge towards the trough. At that point the action on the boat becomes rotational and one leans into the wave to remain upright. The forces vary with the type of breaking wave. For example, a plunging breaker has higher velocities and more volume in the breaking portion than a spilling breaker. We most often see plunging breakers breaking on shore and spilling breakers in open water. Open water plunging breakers may create the most danger for paddlers possibly because paddlers don't expect them. I suspect most paddlers have little trouble with spilling breakers on small waves up to four feet or so. Once they start getting big even a spilling breaker can cause problems for inexperienced paddlers. In an ad for a safety device the picture shows the boat in a two foot spilling breaker. Sort of like those pictures of rescues done in calm water. Everything seems easy under the right circumstances. > > I am thinking you mean a wave **in the act of breaking** -- the basis for the > following comments: In my limited experience, the breaking part of the wave > seems to hammer my up-wave side downward -- "catching" that edge of the boat, > as it were -- and attempting to heel the boat into the breaking wave face. Of > course, once this happens, my upper body leans toward the breaking face, and my > paddle brace goes out, forming a stable configuration as I slide shoreward > along with the wave, in the wall of soup of a fully broken wave. Yes. Once the wave has broken the water begins to fall down the face. at that point you would experience a downward component. One could or should differentiate between "breaking" and "broken" waves. In open water as opposed to surf the broken wave doesn't seem to cause much aggravation. In suspect that surf soup becomes a whole 'nother problem due to the interaction with the bottom. > > > This difference between righting arm and righting moment leads to another > > interesting and sometimes confusing aspect of stability. Due to the > > centrifugal force, the apparent gravitational force varies with location on > > the wave. For example, the apparent gravitational force on the trough > > exceeds that of the force at the crest. Ocean sailors may have some > > familiarity with this for boats heel more on the crests than in the troughs > > (more than the variable wind force causes). > > Wait. Isn't this difference in "apparent" gravitational force more due to the > "free fall" nature of the boat's motion as the crest passes underneath, > contrasted with the wave's acceleration of the boat upwards as the hull passes > the trough? In other words, this is similar to the loss of apparent gravity I > experienced as a kid when my dad would take our old '48 Ford over a bump, and > as the car fell underneath my young tush, I "felt" less upward force from the > car seat -- a not yet free fall situation, but less force between me and the > car seat. Or, perhaps the effect I describe supplements the one you describe? Supplements it. Elevators, swings, etc. produce the same effect. Froude made a device to test this using something called a "Scotch yoke" (I had to look this up in a book on mechanical linkages) that mimics the motion on a wave. Damned clever those Victorians. If I recall correctly NASA mimicked zero gravity this way but in airplanes. Flew them up high and then let the bottom drop out. Makes my stomach turn and perhaps may help to explain why we get sea sick on big smooth waves. Cheers, John Winters Web site address http://home.ican.net/~735769 *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon Sep 25 2000 - 03:52:16 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:32 PDT