Matt Broze wrote: > John Winters wrote: > <SNIP> > > Breaking waves present a different problem and one has to work to avoid > > being swept ahead at the translational speed of the breaking wave crest > > which exceeds twice the wave speed (or, if into these things, work to > > maintain an ideal position on the breaking wave face. > > I may be missing something here, but I fail to see how the transitional wave > (breaking soup) can travel faster than the deep water wave crest that > created it. Matt, I think Winters is referring to the *breaking* wave crest, **as** the wave turns into a breaker, and you are referring to the resulting transational wave ("the soup") -- he is talking apples and you are speaking oranges. The top of the breaking crest moves forward (momentarily) faster than the lower part of the wave -- a feature which disintegrates quickly to form soup. In any case, I wonder how well-developed good theories are for soup, it being a rather disturbed, turbulent state (re: formula you quote below). > Or even much faster than the speed of the slowed and steepened > breaker that created it moments before. Just how and why does it suddenly > pick up any extra speed much less "exceed twice the wave speed" as John > says. I have a found a formula that calculates the speed of a translational > wave (soup) that is based on the waves height and the depth of the water > below it. (speed in ft/sec. = sqrt (wave height + water depth) x 32) > (multiply the result by .59155 for speed in knots). While this may make it > appear that speed is independent of the parent wave's speed and size, it is > obvious that the size of the initial wave is going to determine how high a > soup can be. The speed (depends on wavelength) and the wave height of the > parent wave will determine into how deep of water the wave breaks. I'm not > sure yet how the soup's height relates to the height of the deep water wave > (or the height of the breaking crest) but from my experiences surfing I'd > say that the transitional wave height is far smaller than the breaking crest > height (I'd guess about 1/2 as high as the breaking crest--couldn't find > this info in "Waves and Beaches"). Since a wave breaks in water about 1.3 > times its wave height and a deep water wave won't get any higher than > 7 times its wavelength Matt: you mean ** 1/7th ** its wavelength, don't you? > without breaking this will put an upper limit on the > heights and water depths to plug into the formula above. -- Dave Kruger Astoria, OR *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Wed Sep 27 2000 - 01:21:38 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:32 PDT