Doug wrote: >>>I know enough respected, big name paddlers who share a similar view about the need for weight in open water conditions. <<< Who, besides Derek Hutchinson? While I agree that weight can help in extreme conditions it doesn't have to be the weight of the kayak. I think this is often used as a justification for British heavies. Below is some of what I wrote to Derek concerning the manuscript I had reviewed for "Derek Hutchinson's Guide to Sea Kayaking" back in (I believe) 1983 or 1984. I still believe much of the design information in that book was in reality mostly advertising for Derek's kayaks in America. <SNIP> My main interests are in the areas of safety and kayak design. That will be obvious from what follows. We obviously have some different ideas when it comes to designs. As a designer yourself you are in an awkward position when writing about designs since many readers will consider what you say to be no more than advertising copy for your designs. I have never met a kayak designer yet that didn't feel his designs were the best. One could hardly expect that your writing on design wouldn't reflect your experience as a designer. May I suggest that you confront this issue directly by stating it and then proceed to describe what you think a kayak should be able to do and how it should perform in the hands of an experienced kayaker. Mention as, Frank Goodman does in his lectures on design, the problems the designer faces and some of the compromises that must be made (or worked around). Finally get down to the ways yourself and other designers attempt to solve the problems. This is the dangerous area as its easy to present your own solutions as the only solutions. This book could easily become the bible of the sport, it would be too bad if all future designers felt hesitant about trying some new solution to a design problem because you had stated emphatically that such and such was a must on a seaworthy kayak. If you get down to basics and present the problems that need solutions and then present some of the solutions you have discovered or have heard about in a way that mentions the possible advantages and disadvantages of each I think you can avoid dogmatism which may later be an embarrassment to you <SNIP> p23) The difference in handling of kayaks weighing 10 to 20 pounds more is very small although 20 pounds of ballast concentrated at one end or the other can be quite significant. It is easy to add ballast to a kayak but much more difficult to make the heavier kayak easy for a small person to carry. The real trade off with weight is strength and rigidity, but even here materials and construction methods can make a big difference. A 60 pound vacuumed bagged kayak made of vinylester and woven roving is easily the match for a 75 pound kayak of polyester resin and mostly fiberglass mat and coremat. It is when you start pushing the limits of lightness (30 to 40 pounds) that even the strongest materials won't help much due to the flexibility of the thin laminate and the stress risers that form on flexing beyond certain limits. Here in the Northwest the public demands and gets a kayak that is a little too lightweight to take hard pounding on rocks or enders in surf. Few people here need all the extra strength that 10 pounds would bring. Those that do usually order a kayak of their choice custom built to heavy duty specifications. Since only a few will buy the heavy duty kayak you can hardly expect that a manufacturer would not try to satisfy the demand but insist that if the customer wants one of his kayaks he must buy a heavyduty one. He would soon be bankrupt. Matt Broze http://www.marinerkayaks.com *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon Oct 09 2000 - 03:14:25 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:32 PDT