PaddleWise by thread

From: Rev. Bob Carter <revkayak_at_ptialaska.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] ethics
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:54:09 -0800
  It would appear to me that you are suggesting that "ethics" are flexible. 





I am saying that ethics are situational....as in the example of the kayaker
who approached the whale (illegal according to the marine law) to see if the
whale was in trouble, which it was. had he strickly obeyed the law the young
humpback may have perished.


also sometimes the law is immoral such as the segregation laws in our country
in the 50's and sixties. opposing those laws was ethical.


Bob


Sitka








***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Outfit3029_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] ethics
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:56:02 EDT
In a message dated 10/24/00 5:06:40 PM !!!First Boot!!!, 
revkayak_at_ptialaska.net writes:

<< I am saying that ethics are situational....as in the example of the kayaker
 who approached the whale (illegal according to the marine law) to see if the
 whale was in trouble, which it was. had he strickly obeyed the law the young
 humpback may have perished. >>
 
   This would fall under matters of extenuation and mitigation wouldn't it. 
Neither of the first two posts described an injured animal. 
   I still fail to see the link to explaining why I should be excused from 
the law simply because I choose not to comply. 
 
 <<Also sometimes the law is immoral such as the segregation laws in our 
country
in the 50's and sixties. Opposing those laws was ethical.>>
  
   Are you trying to imply that the MMPA is immoral?

Bruce McC
WEO
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Rick Sylvia <Rick.Sylvia_at_ferginc.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] ethics
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:38:14 -0400
	Wow! This is gettin deep....

	Let's see.  Ethics and morals are really the same thing....they are
what "you" believe in, while the masses may or may not agree with you.
Integrity is how you respond to your ethics when nobody is looking, so to
speak. Therefore, a person who, lets say, believes all wildlife is bad and
should be killed, holds killing wildlife as his ethics/morals.  They are
only "bad" because they aren't mainstream thoughts.  Further, if he follows
through with it and kills an animal every chance he gets, then he's
responding to his ethics/morals with a high degree of integrity!  Okay, we
don't neccessarily agree with him, but we respect his integrity, right?!?!?

	Okay, now lets say the government passes a law that you don't agree
with.   Do you disregard the law, and by so doing, effectively hold your own
little revolution, or do you submit to the law (that, by the way, you agree
to when you accept the honor of being a citizen of whereever you are) and
try to create change from within the system?

	If enough people decide to reject their agreement to work within the
system, then chaos emerges.  From chaos comes the extremeties of change -
some good, some bad - kinda like destruction preceeds construction.
Somewhere in there, someone will want to get control where there is none,
thus dictators emerge...some benevolent, some ruthless.  Is ruthlessness
neccessary to restore calmness and order, and is calmness and order a good
agent to create positive advancements.

	Hummmm...sound like the beginning of any wars anyones ever heard
about or participated in?

	What's my point, you ask?............... I don't have one. I'm just
here to stir, stir, stir, stir, stir.........  Anyone want to take a break
from changing the world and talk "more directly" about Paddling?  :-)

	Rick  (....Virginia)

	(go ahead, take a shot.....I'm wearing my super duper flame
resistent underwear today - and for those who are interested, the answer
is..........Jockies - white - usually Fruit of the Looms.... but I will take
requests if asked nicely)



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:18 PDT