Peter wrote: , > > It might be that Navel Architecture does not consider and define "secondary > stability", as John points out, because it is not relevant to the vast > majority of vessels. Only in kayaks and perhaps smaller canoes can one > even perceive such a phenomena since you more or less wear the kayak and > control it by twists and shifts of your body. In an ocean liner or > freighter no one can feel secondary stability, it is a meaningless concept > to the designer and the crew. The same is true of sail boats, catamarans, > fishing boats, etc. First, I referred to the use of the term "secondary stability" and pointed out that naval archirtects refer to the phenomenon as "overall stability". Oveall stabilty applies to all boats. > > Why would an industry attempt to define an undetectable, meaningless > phenomena with no commercial application? It is only kayakers that > perceive it, and they are unique. And since it appears to be largely a > perceived phenomenon not apparently detectable on the stability curves, > hence the difficulty in measuring it. It is neither undectable or meaningless and does have a commecial application. > > It had not even occurred to me until Matt mentioned that it does not show > up on the stability curves. It does show up in the stabilty curves if you know what to look for. >One would think that in a kayak with good > secondary stability, the curves would get steeper toward the top, and ones > with low secondary stability would have more rounded, flatter stability > curves. But this is not the case so it must largely be based on perception > of the kayaker. Tell me what you perceive if not the forces acting on the boat. (SNIP) > It looks like if there is some measurable difference in secondary stability > in hull designs it is up to the kayaking community (designers, > manufactures, etc.) to figure out how to define and measure it. Apparently > no one else is interested or even cares. You may even have to measure the > kayaker's skill and coordination, and factor that into the physical > parameters of the hull. People do care, C.J. Marchaj wrote an entire book on it. The IMO has done extensive studies on it. Cheers, John Winters *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri Nov 17 2000 - 05:53:30 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:34 PDT