Re: [Paddlewise] RFI Opinion on waterproof camera

From: Dean Koga <dkkoga_at_panix.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:12:52 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001 NEWTOT_at_mail.modot.state.mo.us wrote:

> BGOTO (blinding glimpse of the obvious) - I'm sure the solution is to have two
> cameras, one on deck (small fixed lens), the other stashed in a pelican case (a
> nice zoom).
>
That is the system I use, but it has its drawbacks.  Last sumer we were
passed by a pod of Orcas going the other way.  I fumbled for the
telephoto, and realized I wasn't going to get it out in time.  Precious
seconds elapsed.  By the time I decided to shoot with the Canon
waterproof, the Orcas were far enough away that their spouts and fins
showed up as tiny specks  on the photos because of the 32mm lens.  People
are paitient with me when I point out the miniscule little plumes of mist,
but it is very unsatisfying to me.  A waterproof zoom would be the best
solution.

Dean



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Thu Jan 18 2001 - 08:37:41 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:36 PDT