<In my experience(qualification: I have no interest in looking at photograph of a resolution chart, especially with a magnifying glass), lens quality has little bearing on the sharpness of an image. The anchoring of the camera by the photographer and the mechanics of the equipment has a greater impact.> I can agree that shaking the camera body certainly effects the quality of the image. It will negate the effect of the best lens. Leaving aside that type of external factor, it is the lens that primarily dictates the sharpness of the photograph. A sharp photo requires a good lens first, and good film secondly. The lens receives and transmits the image to the film. All irregularities in the lens show up on the image that arrives at the film. Therefore, image sharpness degrades with the amount of lens irregularities. Most brand name films are just dandy. Because of film advances, I would also agree that even the high speed (eg, ASA 400) are fine for most uses. The camera body, is however, nearly irrelevant to the sharpness. What was said in the 30's is just as true today. "Give me a good lens and film, and I will give you a good picture from a cigar box." JKL *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri Jan 19 2001 - 05:52:24 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:37 PDT