ari0236_at_Saunalahti.fi wrote: > > Dear "aunt" Ally´s pics had certain darkening towards the corners. She was using the same weatherproof Olympus My2 as I, but with a zoom. It did not work well, though mine did. I was under impression that vignetting was only a consideration with large format cameras these days. apparently there is some quality control issues even with the new cameras. > > Lessons learnt: they (in general, the manufacturers) are still not able to produce high quality zoom lenses with reasonable prices. The REAL 'sharp zealots' would never even consider a zoom. Far too many compromises in sharpness. I am having my first experience with a short zoom on my new digital, kinda cute but nothing I would consider in a fast situation. I would imagine it is a very useful accessory for a lot of people out there though. It definitely appeals to the vanity of my wife however as she doesn't seem to go for a 'Romanesque' nose when I shoot wider. > > To me, nothing beats good old Nikonos, pre-set depth of field/ f16 & automatic exposure time. Lenses do count, and almost unbreakable camera bodies. Using this argument, I would agree with you. A wider angle lens (to me, 35mm is normal) with a good depth of field have gotten me through a lot of situations with an image or two worth keeping (if I was lucky). In fact, this is the general way that I shoot. Someone on the list had posted the exposures listed on the old film boxes when manual cameras were in the majority, as well as the 'sunny over the shoulder ASA rule'. This and the maximum depth of field allowed me to work both fast and unobtrusive for many years and many frames. It is a very fine method and reduces the decisions to 5 basic exposures in daylight (which you don't have too much of these days, huh Ari?) with some compensation (from experience) to shooting in the shadows of high buildings or deep woods (I am assuming the deep woods thing as being a city boy). This paradigm makes a manual camera faster than any automatic camera. Of course, the REAL 'sharp zealots' would only use critical focus. An interesting side note- I had a Nikonos (no #, old one) that I had bought to specifically do a project of photographing fill flash in the rain . I was working a full time + job in New York City with one or two days a week off to devote to this. During a 2 year period, I had 1 day of rain on a day off. Since the muses were not on my side for this project, I traded the camera (+ rollei 35s, speed graphic, chinon SLR) for a fujica 6x9 rangefinder. Even today, I always have clear weather when I vacation. The only exception I can remember is at the AKT symposium last summer, we had an afternoon of rain. As I remember though, a lot more was expected. The problem with this is that I love the rain. I guess I love weather, cause I can't complain about the clear days either. Again Ari, I feel embarrassed in only speaking english and not accommodating you with a reply in your own language. I really appreciate all of you out there from different lands making the compromises so that someone like me can learn from your responses and thoughts. best, gabriel -- Gabriel L Romeu http://studiofurniture.com İİİİİ furniture from the workshop http://studiofurniture.com/diary İİİİİ life as a tourist, daily journal http://studiofurniture.com/paint İİİİİ paintings, photographs, etchings, objects *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sat Jan 20 2001 - 06:46:39 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:37 PDT