RE: [Paddlewise] retrofitting bulkheads

From: Joe Federici <fedo_at_hudsonet.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 18:31:54 -0500
>A problem with the forward bulkhead as the footrest, is that the bulkhead


>may fail with injurious or boat sinking consequences if the boat does an


>ender into a sandbar or rock.





Assuming were talking about a properly built and reinforced bulk if 


need be head I disagree that foot pegs are a better system or that 


they would be less dangerous.





I think in most cases foot pegs would break during lesser manageable 


pirouette or enders. Once that happens you'd slide forward and get 


worked. If I'm getting jammed forward with enough force to break my 


bulk head I in trouble no mater what?





Before I bought ordered my Romany I spoke with a few designers about, 


Aled William (designer of the Romany), Nigel Dennis, and Nigel Foster 


and all said a properly built bulk head was safer. Pegs are American 


thing. It allows one boat to built for many people and resale easier.





that's my 2¢ anyway





JFF








***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Thu Feb 22 2001 - 15:23:56 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:38 PDT