If this notion is of interest paddlers might find the discussion of flow among mountain climbers worth the reading while. I'd recommend consideration, too, of reading more than just descriptions of the psychological condition labeled flow. A sea of masters' theses and doctoral dissertations have been floated on the flow notion without adding much. It is worth examining also what sociological conditions inhibit or enhance the possibilities of flow. We don't always merely will flow into being. Some social-sturctural conditions are more conducive to the full, focused commitment of one's skills, concentration, and vigor than others. For those interested in these issues consider: Mountain Experience, The Psychology and Sociology of Adventure, University of Chicago Press, 1983, 1985 See especially Chapter 12, 13 and 14, 15. Mountain Experience concludes with these remarks, applicable too, I think, to paddlers "Mountain climbers [paddlers] are not looking for greater security, stability, and certainty in their lives. Typically, these qualities are seen as being overabundant. Rather they are seeking in leisure a test of their limits in a gratifying no-compromise situation where their behavior is meaningful and outcomes depend upon their own self-directed action. For them stress is an essential ingredient in leisure experience. Mountaineers and certainly others who engage in risk avocations demand a challenge to the entire spectrum of their perceived capacities. Complete expression of personal creativity and freedom is only possible when the activity tests the individual to his or her fullest. For these people leisure without stress is unsatisfying and incomplete. In what they perceive as a homogenized, sterilized, rationalized, and rule-governed social world, climbers and their iLk seek a raw encounter with an environment that can only be met with a full measure of personal commitment, innovation, and investment. To be without stress is to be eddied in the stream of life-experiences, cut off from stimuli, noxious or otherwise. Less is required of the person and less is possible. The opposite of stress is not celebration, satisfaction, or tranquility. It is a state of reduced awareness and diminished capacity, of torpid disinterest as found in drug-induced stupor and, when logically extended, in coma and quintessentially in death. Only by the distortions of Orwellian doublethink can such stresslessness be judged a desirable leisure goal. Civilization protects us not just from real dangers but sometimes from the full possibilities of our humanity....The perceived scope of available meaningful tasks in the modern industrial world is for some persons as restricted as [prison] camp-life opportunities. Science and technology provide facts and leverage but offer no global understanding or inclusive moral order. They strip life of mystery and spirituality. Rationalized [in the sociological sense of of the term -- rm.] play loses its iconic meaning and autotelic reward. But there are solutions. We are not shut up forever within the iron cage; it is of human design and we can escape from it. The transition is not complete. Play and other enjoyable actions are not all rationalized away. The immense possibilities of human spirit are not yet flattened to the dehumanized outline of two-dimensional man. While the vital reaffirmation of self in flow comes only from comprehensive, committed engagement, we are capable of that effort. Flow is to be found in the climbing of mountains [and paddling]. This book attests to that. But for some the mountains [or the sea] may be far away or otherwise unreachable. Perhaps the most important thing learned from a study of climbers [and paddlers] is the potential of flow in daily life. Invisible mountains surround us all. They are hidden in stamp collection albums, in paints and brushes, in the well-written lines of a letter to a dear friend or an irritating politician, in making a fine souffle, in delivering a convincing speech, or in performing delicate surgery. Flow is not reserved for games or play in the limited sense of sport or recreation (it is unlikely there for all but professionals) but is possible whenever unswerving commitment, energy, and will find meaningful and effective application in the world of social experience." Richard G. Mitchell, Jr. Oregon State University Department of Sociology Corvallis, OR 97331 U.S.A. (541)752-0755; 737-5377 mitchelr_at_ucs.orst.edu -- Richard G. Mitchell, Jr. Oregon State University Department of Sociology Corvallis, OR 97331 U.S.A. (541)752-0755; 737-5377 mitchelr_at_ucs.orst.edu *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon Apr 30 2001 - 11:31:00 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:42 PDT