Re: [Paddlewise] Forward paddling, paddle length and cockedwrists

From: Dave Kruger <dkruger_at_pacifier.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 13:05:25 -0700
HTERVORT_at_aol.com wrote:

[snip of excellent treatise on length and blade area components of "my paddle
is too long"]

> Here again, people sometimes tend to simplify the length and/or blade-size
> "equations" too much.  

> Dave Kruger wrote:  >Generated significant tendon pain
> when "graduated" from a 235 cm Werner San Juan (monster blades) to a 245 . .
> . .Switched to a 220 cm Lightning standard sea kayak paddle that summer
> (medium-size blades) and have been relatively tendon-pain-free since<

> You cannot separate paddle length from blade size.  Either a longer paddle
> *or* a larger blade will increase the drive of the paddle and thus slow your
> stroke and also place more stress on your muscles and all the suspension
> hardware in your wrist, elbow and shoulder joints.  If Dave had switched from
> the 235 SJ to a 245 Camano (10% less blade area) instead of maintaining the
> same blade area, he would have had about the same force in his forward
> stroke, with more reach during his sweeps and braces, but with more paddle
> sticking out into the wind (everything has its up and down sides).
> In touring, we usually use a longer paddle than in racing or WW because it
> allows us to keep the elbows down low, near our sides, to reduce the effort
> expended in raising and lowering the weight of the arm/paddle combo during
> each stroke and to also keep the blade low.  Even if we can all agree on
> this, however, there are still other arguments for preferring either a little
> longer or shorter that people will come up with.  This is certainly reflected
> in regional differences you will see.  For example, the Brits seem to prefer
> sub-220 cm paddles for single touring kayaks, while many in the Northwest USA
> have championed 230-240 cm or longer for the same boat category, and we sell
> mostly 220-230 cm paddles for single touring boats.

Harold, I should have been more explicit.  After I blew out my tendons with the
245 San Juan, I could not paddle comfortably even going back to the 235 San
Juan.  In order to decrease the stresses on my wrist, elbow, shoulder system to
the point that I did not re-injure myself, I had to back off to the shorter
Lightning, which also has a smaller blade area than the San Juan.  In other
words, I had to work both pieces of the paddle system in the same direction.

The paddle I use has a smaller blade face than the Camano, so I doubt switching
from a 235 SJ to a 235 Camano would have been OK.  For the record, the only
time I wish I had that San Juan back is in surf.  That small Lightning stick
just does not give me enough push on bracing and steering, _quick enough!_

It's hell getting old!

-- 
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Wed May 09 2001 - 13:12:32 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:42 PDT