I think blade aspect ratio (length vs. width) has a lot to do with the difference between greenland and euro paddles, especially in rolling where the paddle is sliced through the water, like an airplane wing, to produce lift. That lift produces drag (called induced drag in aerodynamics) which is caused mostly by turbulence/vortexes at the wing tips. The greater the demand for lift the greater the drag. The classic way to gain a favorable lift vs. drag ratio is to reduce the size of the tips by using long skinny wings. Thats why sailplanes have high aspect ratio wings and why greenland paddles excel when sliced through the water. The euro paddle is the opposite case. It has a low aspect ratio and when called on for lift while being sliced through the water, it produces a lot of tip loss/induced drag. On the other hand, as Ralph H. pointed out, its low aspect ratio gives it a favorable ratio of blade area to circumference (lots of area with little circumference) so that it bites the water better in the forward stroke--especially when you really honk on it--than the greenland paddle which has an unfavorable ratio of circumference to blade area. Re: the "Technology guides paddle design " thread, I would say that in icy Greenland waters, rolling, and sculling braces are more important to survival than quick acceleration in forward strokes, so while materials (drift wood) certainly influenced paddle shape, I think the Greenlanders' high aspect ratio blades are as much a function of their use as of the materials available. The Greenlanders made a virtue of their necessity. Clark Bowlen *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sat May 12 2001 - 14:42:32 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:42 PDT