Re: [Paddlewise] nomenclature

From: Michael Daly <michaeldaly_at_rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 12:49:54 -0500
From: "Richard Culpeper" <culpeper_at_tbaytel.net>

> (I don't know the whys and wherefores.  I simply know that when I worked
> on one, that is what everyone else called it.)

When I asked a naval architect about this years ago, he said:
"A ship is a large boat and a boat is a small ship."

When I look into two books on hand, I find the definitions
of "boat" and "ship" almost as vague as the above.  Ship
is considered to be a decked vessel with three masts, square
rigged, with bowsprit, topmasts and topgallant masts.  I 
guess that makes the carrier USS Enterprise a boat!

Bradford's "The Mariner's Dictionary" says that only small 
submarines are boats while the Oxford Companion to Ships 
and the Sea states that all subs are boats.  The latter
defines ships as "sea-going vessels", but declines to 
offer a definition of "sea" nor an opinion as to whether
the Great Lakes are an inland sea.  The former dictionary
suggests that boats are small and undecked - hence a laker
is a ship.

When in doubt, say vessel and be done with it!

Mike



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Sun Dec 30 2001 - 09:49:01 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:47 PDT