Fernando wrote: >But considering sponsons and paddle floats as true alternatives to the roll >is in my opinion a grate mistake. Rolling is not that hard to learn and >doesn't require any special ability neither physical shape. Everybody can >and should learn to roll, because roll is to kayaking as important as the >forward stroke. Actually, rolling can be learned before the rest of the >techniques, making the whole learning process faster and easier. Students >feel more safe when leaning the kayak knowing if hey can capsize they can >always roll back up. I have taught this way for years with grate success. Well said, Fernando. Threads on equipment based alternatives to rolling seem to go around and around but never seem to address the needs fully. I applaud your assertion that rolling can be taught first. I am a great fan of the rapid skills development that often occurs after a student learns to roll reliably, in large part because their fear of capsize is eliminated. Sooner or later we all find ourselves in situations or conditions that may require a rescue. In these situations, a reliable roll might mean the difference between a fun day in conditions and the end of an otherwise enjoyable day. I can understand that not everyone enjoys dancing on the outer edge of his or her comfort envelope, all the more reason to develop a reliable roll. Paddle floats, Sponsons and other device dependent rescue methods all suffer from the same flaw, they all are preceded by a wet exit and all the discomfort and rapid cooling that can come with it. Michael Daly's response brings up some interesting points. Michael, please forgive the heavy editing and my taking your words out of context. >For some folks, rolling is hard to learn. Agreed, and for many people it is even harder to teach. I remember some of the frustrations I felt teaching some students to roll. I have come to believe that it was not the student that stood in the way of their learning but rather my inexperience teaching to that type of student. Michael, I believe you have a reliable roll, no? Would you describe the roll you perform as requiring significant strength or inordinate flexibility? When asked if rolling is difficult I remind my students that this 46 year old, overweight, out-of-shape and inflexible paddler has no difficulty rolling wherever and whenever I find myself in need. >There's no such thing as a bombproof roll either. Some folks have extremely good rolling skills, but there will come a time when they're out of the boat. They need a backup too. Agreed. There are really only two types of paddlers, those that have swum and those that will. But isn't rolling it's own backup? When a roller exits his boat, isn't a reenter and roll the first choice of rescues? Will anything more than a paddle float or, God forbid, an assisted rescue be required? Rolling is not a panacea, we still need to observe safety guidelines like paddling in a group, dressing for immersion and paddling within our abilities. Rolling is a convenience, much faster and safer than a wet exit / rescue, but rarely is a roll a matter of life or death. No doubt some WW paddlers (and the honorable Mr Lloyd) may take issue with my previous statement, but in seakayaking as most practice it, rolls are a convenient and enjoyable self-rescue. That knowing how to roll will help every aspect of our paddling is pure gravy. Jed Luby, Team North Atlantic *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sun Dec 30 2001 - 22:06:11 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:47 PDT