From: "Erik Sprenne" <sprenne_at_netnitco.net> > > But the basic blade shape will determine the susceptibility of the > > paddle to flutter. > > > I agree - but also think that any standardized way of > measuring flutter will also influence the results in some > way. Of course, one could then devise a test method biased > toward the desired results :-) This is a perennial problem. Without a standard test, we're nowhere. With one, we tend to influence things, sometimes the wrong way. For example, years ago, benchmarking computers resulted in computer designers coming up with computers that excelled at the benchmarks to the exclusion of other things. Someone (intermittently on this list lately) at a club meeting this past spring predicted that in a few years all touring paddlers will be using variations of wing paddles (this after we agreed that most paddling "standards" are essentially the current fad and prone to change over time). In that context, a bias against flutter may be inappropriate, since the behavior may be irrelevant in future touring wing paddle design. The engineer in me still prefers a standard (terminology or measurements) so we have at least some baseline for comparison. The people just have to learn how to interpret the results without "getting religion". Mike *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:25 PDT