Mike said > Strictly speaking, the hull can be seen as pivoting around any point. > Rotation is rotation and the rotation is the same regardless of > inertial reference frame chosen. G'Day, Mike, You put forward an intriguing proposition and I'll try hard not to misinterpret but looking at Matt and John's explanations I don't think they are saying the same thing with different frames of reference. Their use of phrases such as rotating around various points (John) and "pivot point" (Matt) were fairly specific and I think in the context of the discussion could be taken as synonymous. Surely also they are both using a common frame of reference (latitude and longitude)? John discussed the boat rotating around the center of flotation (COF) rather than the bow which I interpret as meaning that the COF was a pivot point, while Matt was saying that the center of lateral resistance was the pivot point and didn't necessarily correspond with the COF. If the frame of reference were latitude and longitude in both cases then the physical ramifications of each interpretation would be quite different. I found Matt's explanation of center of lateral resistance (the pivot point) very clear. John's points about effective arm extension differences in moving vs stationary boats were compelling. Much appreciated your historical references which I hadn't heard before. All the best, PeterO *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Jan 10 2002 - 05:17:40 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:48 PDT