On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:36:53 -0500 "John Winters" <jwinters_at_onlink.net> wrote: > >These things always cause problems. However, Dr. >Savitsky pointed out that >the rise in CG during surfing could occur but you could >not call it planing >any more than you could say a person falling off a >building was flying >because he generated some lift. The distinction between >planing and not >planing is the vertical rise caused by the boat's power >not an outside >source. You seem to imply that nothing can "fly" without an internal power source. I disagree with that; sailplanes, hang gliders, and even balloons do fly, despite having no internal power source. Despite a "flying suit" on a skydiver I once saw, I would say that flying requires that most of the weight of the object to be supported by the air - either by buoyancy or lift (and not by drag, so we can rule out terminal velocity falls). I would not require that all the weight be supported by buoyancy or lift, as there is some drag weight support for any flying object in a descent, but certainly the vast majority of it. Continuing this analogy to planing suggests that we need only require that the great majority of the boat's weight be supported by hydrodynamic forces on the hull and not by static displacement, and need not depend on internal power sources. Agreed, some measurable rise in CG doesn't get us there, any more than some measurable lift converts falling to flying, but if not planing, what do you call it? And how does it differ for a sailboarder, who also has no internal power source? I have often heard that described as planing. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Jan 17 2002 - 14:50:46 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:49 PDT