Yes, there are certainly differences between the specialist's teminology and the layman's, and I feel that more specialists must recognise that when communicating with the layman that the layman's terminology will have to take precedent. Especially in the case where the word was in general usage before the specialists took it over and came up with their own precise definition. Engineers can come up with a very precise definition for "hull" but that doesn't mean that when I refer to a "walnut hull" that I have to be refering to a stripper made with walnut. And as for "fly" according to my dictionary it applies to birds, planes, flags, kites, bullets, spacecraft, etc. It says nothing about under it's own propulsion. The definition of plane in my dictionary is "to rise partly out of the water while in motion at high speed." And that is how I have always used the term, therefore get websters corrected before correcting me. Dave Michael Daly writes: > Again we see examples of where a layman's term differs from a > specialist's. Specialists require exactness in terminology > and will use terms in specific ways. Two subtly different > phenomena are referred to by the specialist with distinct terms > so inter-specialist communication is clear. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Jan 17 2002 - 18:00:36 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:49 PDT