PaddleWise by thread

From: Doug Lloyd <dougl_at_islandnet.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] Andomeda
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 18:43:36 -0800
I usually don't pay too much attention to boat comparisons mentioned on
this list, as they are somewhat irrelevant to me (though I faithfully
read all posts). My next boat would likely be a Romany anyway, when
someone finally builds a lighter but as strong North American version.

Anyway, someone new to Paddlewise backchanneled me asking advice about
the CD Andromeda. It is a fairly new boat, with not much of a following
yet. The only discussion I remember was a few negative comments by Steve
at Adlercreek. While I always give credence to everything that Steve
says, I also realize boat comparisons and likes/dislikes are almost
wholly subjective. Steve mentioned, from my best recollection (note that
statement please) that he felt the Andomeda was released a bit too early
by CD, before full refinement (I assume in terms of hull configuration/
characteristics, etc.).

The Andromeda has been highlighted in no less that Popular Mechanics,
and is receiving a bit of attention from other sources. What interests
me in particular, is that the kayak doesn't seem dissimilar to the hull
of the Cirrus (Derek's design from P&H). While there were probably some
minor refinements, the main improvement would be the vacuum bag
manufacturing and the improved North American deck. The boat is
certainly stiff enough, and can always be bought with more reinforcing
if the customer really needs it. I've heard of folks from Arabia paying
three grand to have it shipped ASAP, so someone really likes this boat.

I paddled for years with Doug Alderson and a mutual friend called Tom,
who owned a Cirrus. We paddled in every imaginable condition on open
ocean waters. I know what the Cirrus can and can't do, where its
strength and weaknesses lie. Its not a bad boat at all in a blow or
rough seas for the paddler that can take care of themselves (as opposed
to a kayak that can take care of you) so I'm curious about Steve's
remarks, and was wondering if there were other comments about this boat.
I do know Tom eventually sold the Cirrus for a Gulfstream 2001.

BTW, my ex-GP is moving from his CD Extreme to a  CD Gulfstream 2002. (I
find the Gulfstream a bit too wide for me, but easier to bring back on
course once off-track than the Cirrus -- or Nordkapp). Seems like a lot
of folks in Victoria are paddling the Gulfstream. Maybe there will be a
club for them one day  :-)

Help appreciated,

Doug Lloyd
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: John Fereira <jaf30_at_cornell.edu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Andomeda
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 09:06:22 -0500
At 06:43 PM 2/6/02 -0800, Doug Lloyd wrote:


>The Andromeda has been highlighted in no less that Popular Mechanics,
>and is receiving a bit of attention from other sources. What interests
>me in particular, is that the kayak doesn't seem dissimilar to the hull
>of the Cirrus (Derek's design from P&H).

I've never heard of a Cirrus.  Are you talking about a P&H Sirius?



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Scherrer <Flatpick_at_teleport.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Andomeda
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 09:09:00 -0800
Doug and all,

My testing of the Andromeda ranges from a 5-day, 100 mile trip down the
Willamette river to a 15NM upriver, downwind trip near Astoria.

On the Willy, the boat performed well.  Some fast current work and speedy
downstream paddling was fun.  The boat is speedy, spirited and sporty
(salesman talk for tippy, fast and maneuverable)  No wind so no skeg trial.
It's workmanship is 100%.  Deck layout (IMHO) is 80%. (Perimeter decklines
that don't do the whole perimeter, deck bungies 4" from the front of the
rim, lame spare paddle configuration.)

So I ordered two, one to demo and one to sell.

I should of tested it in some wind.

I got the demo and decided to take her out on a Columbia River EXplorer, our
level 4/5 instruction trips.  Wind was west _at_ 30 knots, seas were up to 4'.
perfect for a Astoria to Knappa landing run.  2 NDK Explorers and a Romany
16 were along for the *ride*.

We paddled up to Tongue point and I was having some trouble falling dead
downwind with the skeg fully deployed, while the NDK's surfed off into the
East.  I managed to get to Tongue where we took a much needed break in the
lee of the point.  I was checking out my chart, no glasses and far sighted,
and almost flipped (sporty, eh?).  Ok this can happen in any spirited boat,
tho I don't have the same problem in my Pintail. Anywho...... back out into
the wind and low and behold came to the conclusion that the boat
weathercocks to about 20º off the wind with the skeg fully deployed.  Rom16
and EX run about 5º.  Surfing was fun, fast and furious when I could get her
to stick at 0 but was quite frustrating when it would slip off to a WC
position.  The NDK's thought it was amusing that Ol' Capt. S was having a
hissy fit.  =:-o)

In looking at the set up it seems that the skeg is rather shallow and quite
far forward.  I would think that Sir Derek or CD would of tested this out
before release.  Maybe the focused market for this boat won't be paddling in
30 knots but I know this cowboy ain't going to pull the Ando outta the
stables for a gnarly ride. rrrrrrrrrrrrrr!

steve



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Doug Lloyd <dougl_at_islandnet.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Andomeda
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 10:41:04 -0800
Steve Scherrer wrote:

> Doug and all,
>
> My testing of the Andromeda ranges from a 5-day, 100 mile trip down
the
> Willamette river to a 15NM upriver, downwind trip near Astoria.

<big snip>

Steve,
Thank you for the report (snipped). It was much more objective than
prior
comments, and I really appreciate you taking the time from your busy day
to jot
down your observations. My backchanneling friend will appreciate the
information
too, I'm sure. Your observations largely confirm what I know about the
P&H
version, though I have no intimate knowledge if the Andromeda and the
Sirius are
related - they just look very similar in terms of hull geometry. One
needs to be
a narrow kayak enthusiast to apprehend the desirability of a kayak like
the
Andomeda. There were days in the past when NA kayak shops _wouldn't_
carry such
a narrow boat - and now they are being fully marketed. Interesting, eh?

I know Tom gave up his Sirius for precisely the same reasons you
mention, namely
weathercocking. So, you think you got a rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr! I've heard
Tom
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr! for 10 days on the west coast (a
particularly
nasty trip we did in constant gale force winds, and he is a top notch
paddler
BTW). Anyway, if the Andromeda is a worthy boat, the market place will
bear this
out in time. As a company, I like Current Designs, but if a spade is a
spade,
the dust will settle where it may with this boat. I've always preferred
a
rounder hull myself than the "V" chine like the Andromeda, but do suffer
trying
to catch smaller wind waves in my Nordkapp. A "V" chine boat also make
beach
launches a little more difficult as the kayak tends to flop from one
side to the
other, whereas a flatter bottom hull amidsection does not. In terms of
running
off course and trying to correct back, a deep draft rudder was my
eventual
solution with the now dated Nordkapp, though I use it as little as
possible.

Thanks John for the corrected spelling on "Cirrus" - damn spell check!

Doug Lloyd (hoping his friends at CD don't get too upset with me, after
all, the
truth shall set the paddler free - or something like that).



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Alder Creek Kayak & Canoe <aldercreek_at_qwest.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Andomeda
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:01:54 -0800
I'm hoping my friends at CD don't get too upset, myself.  I really like
their boats and workmanship, tho I find the truth is the truth.

Agreed on the more rounded hull forms.  The flop from side to side is a bit
weird and IMHO, not necessary.  That aspect is what nearly flipped me.  I
find that I have to roll over till the 2ndary stability catches when at rest
and needing to function in an upright position. Many boats are like this and
my feeling is the speed one gains for the lack of stability (primary) with a
deep, exaggerated *V* is for another paddler, not me.

Maybe some other US manufacturer will come up with a new cool design that
can actually compete with the Britts!  ;-)

Grrrrrrr!!

steve
Alder Creek Kayak & Canoe    N   45º 39' 47"
250 NE Tomahawk Isle Dr.     W 122º 36' 16"
Portland, OR  97217          Web: www.aldercreek.com
Phone: 503.285.0464        Email: aldercreek_at_qwest.net


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Doug Lloyd <dougl_at_islandnet.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Andomeda
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 12:41:29 -0800
One thing that perhaps was forgotten was the fact that some of Derek's
"expeditionary" designs, as well as others, do tend to behave much better with a
full load (or ballast -- of whatever origin). Having said that, I know friends
who have had to ballast their NA kayaks as well, such as the CD Extreme. And as
fast as the Andomeda/Sirius style boats are, they don't sprint well
indefinitely. Tom often lagged behind when we needed to vacate life threatening
conditions (like off Brooks Peninsula during a sudden offshore blow, etc.). Yet
in Tom's wider Gulfstream, he was simply goooooooone. Makes no sense to me.

Doug

Alder Creek Kayak & Canoe wrote:

> I'm hoping my friends at CD don't get too upset, myself.  I really like
> their boats and workmanship, tho I find the truth is the truth.
>
> Agreed on the more rounded hull forms.  The flop from side to side is a bit
> weird and IMHO, not necessary.  That aspect is what nearly flipped me.  I
> find that I have to roll over till the 2ndary stability catches when at rest
> and needing to function in an upright position. Many boats are like this and
> my feeling is the speed one gains for the lack of stability (primary) with a
> deep, exaggerated *V* is for another paddler, not me.
>
> Maybe some other US manufacturer will come up with a new cool design that
> can actually compete with the Britts!  ;-)
>
> Grrrrrrr!!
>
> steve
> Alder Creek Kayak & Canoe    N   45º 39' 47"
> 250 NE Tomahawk Isle Dr.     W 122º 36' 16"
> Portland, OR  97217          Web: www.aldercreek.com
> Phone: 503.285.0464        Email: aldercreek_at_qwest.net
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:27 PDT