(Moderator's Note: Content unaltered. Excessive quoting (i.e. headers/footers/sig lines/comments from previous posts, etc.) have been removed. Please edit quoted material and list footers when replying to posts.) I find the biggest difference between the paddles (despite the shape) is in the with of the blades rather than the total lenght. Consedering that we supply the same amount of power, the shorter paddle (Lindyl) is espected to give a higher cadence than the longer (Whetstone), but in this case, the thinner blade of the Whetstone will slide easyer through the water that the wider Lindyl, creating the oposite effect. In other words, shorter lenght = more spm, but narrower blade = less drag which gives more extra power to increment the spm. Weight and shape and flexion should also be considered, anyway. Fernando Lopez Arbarello *** KAYAK ARGENTINA *** http://home.earthlink.net/~kayakargentina -----Original Message----- From: Matt Broze Subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Paddle blade size Paul Grant paragrant_at_webtv.net wrote: <SNIP>>>>>>> I paddled 1 mile course using two different paddles Lindyl Whetstone cadence 70 spm 80 spm avg sp 4.6 mph 5.3 mph max sp 5.9 6.1<<<<<<<<<<<< I think the reason for the difference in speed is pretty clear 7/8=.875, 4.6/5.3=.868. It looks like each stroke was moving the kayak just about the same distance (which would be expected for paddles of about the same length. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon Jul 22 2002 - 03:51:14 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:55 PDT