RE: [Paddlewise] Sandals are they a hazard?

From: Alex Ferguson <a.ferguson_at_chem.canterbury.ac.nz>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:22:57 +1200
[Chuck]
>Count me as firmly pro-sandal.

Barefeet or sandals here

>  Speaking of ankle support, I think it is overrated.

Are you sure? I mean the Napalese only carry 200-300 lb loads because they 
wear flipflops or bare feet. Imagine what they could do with ankle support, 
carry 1/2 ton all day......

OK, I agree (no ankle support needed) and having talked to another cyclist 
I wonder if cycling also helps - flexibility of the ankle and strength. 
Personally if I get in a situation where the ground angle is too extreme I 
end up on one knee for that step (rough terrain).

>  I, for one, have
>carried over a hundred pounds of gear over many long, rocky, muddy, rooty
>portages in my Tevas without injury (always being careful to watch my
>footing, of course).

Imagine, you could carry 500 pounds with ankle support??????!!!!!

>YMMV. As others have pointed out, some combinations of sandals and 
>footpegs may be more hazardous than others.

If people insist on little "sticky-out" things to put their feet on then 
what do they expect. Either a full bulkhead as a foot rest or full-foot 
pedals so your feet don't go to the wrong side of the pedal. Much more 
important than the footwear.

Alex
.
.


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Tue Aug 27 2002 - 15:24:55 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:58 PDT