On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 04:03:46AM -0700, Peter Staehling wrote: > If you get excited enough to type that many heated > lines over someones comments about a few scratches, > perhaps you need psychiatric help, or maybe just some > time paddling! > :) While I rarely pander to the politically correct crowd, there are areas where one best not tread unless they like a blindfolded stroll through a minefield. Suggesting someone needs psychiatric care, and then couching it in a smiley so as to make it oh so innocuous, is just such an area. Joke about it if you feel you must, but you're nothing but an absolute ass if you do. Psychiatric help suggests psychiatric illness, a legitimate (in every sense of the word) class of diseases of the body, just like heart disease, cancer, and diabetes. Yet the propensity in the western world, particularly within the American quarter, to make light of it at every opportunity, is a major reason the majority of the those that suffer from a diagnosable psychiatric condition (and today's best estimates are that 1 in 4 American adults will suffer such a condition during the course of their adult lives) never seek treatment. The joking, trivialization, and stigmatization represented by callous and clueless comments such as yours, rest in (very large) part at the heart of why this is the case. And, FWIW, these aren't my words, stats, or arguments, but those of family, friends, and colleagues who work in various aspects of psychiatric care and research. Do yourself a favor, put down your copy of "Sea Kayaker's Deep Trouble" for a bit and pick up Andrew Solomon's "The Noonday Demon" (the 2001 National Book Award winner in Nonfiction, if an NBA stamp of approval might persuade you). I can't imagine you wouldn't learn something, even if only that some things, except on the very rarest of occasions, aren't ever funny. As to time paddling, I would love a bit more than I've managed of late. But a shattered tibial plateau followed by a messed up ACL took care of much of this season. But that only fuels my determination to paddle longer into the season of short, cold days to come than I otherwise might. But it hasn't much of anything to do with tolerance for fools and their remarks. I've never suffered either gladly. > LONG rant about someone's comments on boat scratches deleted. One person's rant is another's cogent discourse. If you despise the former, learn to use the <delete> function in your mail software. You'll be happier, so too will I, and I suspect others just might be as well. Heck, maybe you'll get good enough at it you can give lessons :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- WARNING: Stop reading right here if you don't wish to read a (as brief as I can make it) rehash of my objection to the turn this thread took. On various occasions over the last several months, messages were posted to PaddleWise regarding cosmetic issues relating to kayaks, particularly hull and deck damage (scratches, gouges, cracks, etc.) and how to go about repairing such things. Several subscribers, myself among them, have posted repsonse containing either specific advice on how to fix such things or provided pointers to off-list information that would help in the repair process. The questions were legitimate, well meaning, and within the province of the list. So too were the answers. Often, far too often, the thread was high-jacked by subscribers hell bent on sending the message to the original poster, that scratches and other cosmetic damage (or wear, if you prefer) are an essential part of kayaking, and that only tyros and idiots don't understand that fundamental *truth*. The poor soul posting gets dumped upon them the proverbial ton of bricks, when all they wanted to know how to do was fix this or that bit of wear that bothered them on their boat. The message being sent them wasn't just "here is another point of view you might wish to consider," but one of "here is THE point of view, learn it or remain forever ignorant." On at least two such occasions this summer, I received private email from the seed poster of such threads, a) thanking me for information provided and b) asking me what unwritten list etiquette they'd run afoul of that warranted the harsh response belittling their caring about their boat's cosmetics. This behavior does nothing to help those new to the sport or to the list, and everything to give both a tarnished name. I didn't say much, if anything, then, when it might have contributed to a lessening of the knee jerk, stomping propensity sketched out above. I got sick of it all this time around and opted to contribute my two pence. I accept both points of view (cosmetics matter and should be addressed, and that cosmetic damage is really wear and every bit a part of the sport as is getting wet now and again). I don't accept the supremacy of one over the other. And I flatly refuse to tolerate the view that one is *truth* the and the other *foolishness*. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Maybe now we can get back to more interesting, less disagreeable paddling discussion. Then again, maybe not. -- James W. Durkin jwd_at_phonogram.net *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon Sep 30 2002 - 23:26:59 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:00 PDT