PaddleWise by thread

From: Stephen Wan <Steve_at_OlsonArchitect.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] VHF signal triangulation
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 17:18:59 -0700
>>That sounds intriguing and useful - Could you tell us more about the
>>technique of triangulation?

By using directional antennas and signal strength meters, one could find the
general direction that the transmitting signal is coming from. With 3 or
more ships or aircraft in different locations, they can plot on a map, the
separate bearing readings from each position. Where the lines intersect is
the general area the the signal is coming from.

Here's a better explanation.
http://hometown.aol.com/bmgenginc/Triangul.html

Here's how GPS satellites do it:
http://murray.newcastle.edu.au/users/staff/eemf/ELEC351/SProjects_98/Ashby/T
riangulation.htm

Steve
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <michaeldaly_at_rogers.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] VHF signal triangulation
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:00:11 -0400
From: "Stephen Wan" <Steve_at_OlsonArchitect.com>

> >>That sounds intriguing and useful - Could you tell us more about the
> >>technique of triangulation?
> 
> By using directional antennas and signal strength meters, one could find the
> general direction that the transmitting signal is coming from. With 3 or
> more ships or aircraft in different locations, they can plot on a map, the
> separate bearing readings from each position. Where the lines intersect is
> the general area the the signal is coming from.

The Canadian Coast Guard has many ground stations around the Great Lakes 
(presumably, so does the US) and can do triangulation easily.  In fact,
when I took my Restricted Operator's Certificate (Maritime) course this 
past spring, the instructors made a point (more than once) of advising 
folks not to use the radio _and_ try crossing the Canada-US border in 
their boats. They pointed out that these areas are monitored and that 
the monitoring has likely been stepped up in the past year.

I'd also assume there are similar capabilities in the Pacific (BC-Wash.)
and Atlantic (NB/NS - Maine).

It's a useful feature for SAR and a security feature in both the so-called
drug war and for fear of terrorists.

Mike



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: PeterO <rebyl_kayak_at_iprimus.com.au>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] VHF signal triangulation
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:54:21 +1000
Stephen wrote
>By using directional antennas and signal strength
>meters, one could find the general direction

Michael wrote
>The Canadian Coast Guard has many ground stations
>around the Great Lakes (presumably, so does the US)
>and can do triangulation easily.

G'day

Thanks very much for the comments and explanations - the web site seems to
indicate that this can be a special set up for emergencies and Michaels
comments suggest it can also be a routine set up at some coast guard
stations. In such a case what is the correct protocol for accessing
information? Do you have to make a request and then continue talking while
the triangulation is carried out - or is it nearly instantaneous? When I was
a kid it took several minutes fiddling with the angle on a ferrite rod
aerial to get a bearing on a radio station. I haven't heard of this facility
in Australian Coast guard stations but will investigate after I understand
the protocol a bit better.

All the best, Peter



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <michaeldaly_at_rogers.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] VHF signal triangulation
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 09:07:29 -0400
From: "PeterO" <rebyl_kayak_at_iprimus.com.au>

> In such a case what is the correct protocol for accessing
> information? Do you have to make a request and then continue talking while
> the triangulation is carried out - or is it nearly instantaneous? 

AFAIK, the triangulation is done automatically and quickly.  I am not aware
of any protocol to request the information on position from the Coast Guard.
>From the way that the course instructor talked, it sounds like something 
they might not readily acknowledge if you ask informally on a routine
call.  Standard protocol on any priority message is for the person making
the call to indicate their position and the Coast Guard doesn't turn
around and tell the world where you are if you don't know.  If SAR is
involved, triangulation is used by them, but we weren't taught to expect 
the CG to broadcast a location based on this; it's handled entirely by
a local military base that manages all SAR activities.

Mike

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Craig Bowers <craig_at_bowers.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] VHF signal triangulation
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:53:14 -0700
>AFAIK, the triangulation is done automatically and quickly.  I
>am not aware
>of any protocol to request the information on position from the
>Coast Guard.
>something
>they might not readily acknowledge if you ask informally on a routine
>call.  Standard protocol on any priority message is for the
>person making
>the call to indicate their position and the Coast Guard doesn't turn
>around and tell the world where you are if you don't know.  If SAR is
>involved, triangulation is used by them, but we weren't taught
>to expect
>the CG to broadcast a location based on this; it's handled entirely by
>a local military base that manages all SAR activities.

Indeed, the equipment has been in place for decades and is common place
on ships, ground stations, and SAR aircraft.  Virtually every airport or
flight service station has them for the air controllers as well.  All a
controller has to do is look at an indicator to get your bearing.  And
assuming sufficient separation between the two monitoring stations, only
two receivers are required to deduce your location, more just confirm it.

In fact in a more rudimentary sense, nearly every general aviation and
commercial aircraft has similar equipment on board for navigation
purposes (though not applicable for this use).  It's a loop antenna and
an instrument called an ADF (automatic direction finder), that simply
points a needle on the bearing of the signal on the frequency it's tuned
to.  In this case generally covering the AM broadcast band.  You tune to
the station and listen in to confirm it's identity and home in on the
known location.  You can obtain your own physical position by getting the
bearing of two or more known transmitters, and intersecting the bearings
on your map.  AM radio stations work just as well as official navigation
beacons since they periodically state their call letters and transmitting
towers are listed on aviation maps with their call letters beside.
Official navigation beacons NDB's (Non Direction Beacons) are just AM
radio stations of a standard output power (typically 50MW) and constantly
transmit a morse code identifier (also listed on aviation maps).

So this is just the reverse process.  You as the kayaker are the "NDB" so
to speak.  And  multiple "ADF's" compare their observed bearings to you,
the station, to obtain your fix.  If it's a SAR aircraft, they can home
right in on you with no help from any other station if need be (as long
as you're transmitting).  Just as any aircraft can home in on an airport
with an NDB, or home from station to station enroute from one place to
another.

As for the CG and it's implementation and policies I have no information,
I'm just getting my feet wet in the kayaking realm (renting currently
with a view to buy a Feathercraft Klondike).  In order for an automatic
position fix, it's presumable that their systems range anywhere from a
bearing and signal strength (not a great indicator of distance, but
better than nothing) indication as is found in airport towers, that a CG
radio operator can glance at and compare with other operators bearings
(verbally), all the way up to an automated system that monitors all VHF
communications and relative fixes by comparing the bearings from
networked but diverse receivers (putting the results on a map display for
a CG or marine controller say at Comox).

Without the advantage of the latter example, it's not possible for a
single radio operator to tell you where you are, only your bearing from
him.  Perhaps that's why it's not as commonly used in marine situations.
Your request may require him to call another CG station and compare
notes.  Whereas presumably a large CG center may have this computed and
put on a display and it would be trivial.  There may also be an element
of legal responsibility involved in the reluctance to provide that
information.  It's up to the operator of a craft to make navigation
decisions and accept responsibility for the results of those decisions.
If the CG tells you where they think you are, and you act on it, but
there was a system failure, or solar flares, or some RF anomaly in your
location, and you get your self in hot water because you proceeded off in
a direction based on erroneous information provided by the CG, then they
run the risk of shared blame.

It is less common these days in the aviation realm (which I'm familiar
with as a licensed commercial pilot) for such services to be requested,
but wasn't uncommon 15-20 years ago.  I myself have requested a "DF
Steer" a few times as a green private pilot, when in a lightly
instrumented Cessna 150, and weaving my way around low and visibility
limiting cloud.  Every tower or flight service station could give you
one, but that was just a bearing to the tower (which is often your
intended destination).  You'd ask for a DF Steer, he'd go over to the
instrument and ask you to transmit again, and he'd read your bearing off
the instrument (looks like a big compass, but with the "needle" pointing
to the aircraft that's transmitting on the airport frequency). I'm not
sure in the marine environment it's as useful a tool, since how often is
your destination in your kayak, the coast guard station?  To ask for a
triangulation fix may well require some effort and inter-station
communication, which when they're busy, may not be warmly received.

Back in the aviation realm, typically, requesting a service more involved
as a position fix, or assistance in navigation, prequires you to first
declare an aircraft emergency.  Then you get all the help in the world.
The price however is all the paperwork in the world afterwards, and
having to explain how your inept preparation and poor navigation skills
got you into that predicament in the first place.  At a minimum you can
likely expect a mandatory ground school refresher to be demanded of you,
and perhaps reimbursing the air traffic and SAR services for their time
(woe to you if a SAR Hercules was dispatched, billing out at $5000
Canadian per hour). YMMV but a GPS may be cheaper ;-)

-Craig Bowers
Vancouver, Canada
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Doug Lloyd <dougl_at_islandnet.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] VHF signal triangulation
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 23:05:36 -0700
Peter said:
<<<
Thanks very much for the comments and explanations - the web site seems
to indicate that this can be a special set up for emergencies and
Michaels comments suggest it can also be a routine set up at some coast
guard stations. In such a case what is the correct protocol for
accessing information? <snip n' nip>
>>>

Sorry I never got back to you - I have only recently returned to the
land of the living from migraine hell. I see you got a few responses
already. In BC water, VTC (Vessel Traffic Control) can pinpoint your
position. Mariners, where needed, can contact VTC with their
trajectories where there could be interaction hazards with large moving
vessels. For the paddler, fog-obscured crossings could prove hazardous
where convection fog, etc. moves in unexpectedly. The authorities can
pinpoint various vessels, including the lowly kayaker from what I
understand, and let you or others know where you are or where to take
remedial action. A paddler in trouble can merely click the talk button
to gain signal triangulation. Paddlers should also know the morse code
for SOS. I was once hit so hard on my Adams Apple by a paddle shaft,
that I wasn't too far away from loosing my voice. I'm not aware of any
protocol, other than most paddlers don't practice any with respect to
crossing shipping lanes.

Doug



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: PeterO <rebyl_kayak_at_iprimus.com.au>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] VHF signal triangulation
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 06:26:37 +1000
G'Day Doug and Craig,

It seems as if there is quite a bit of variability in what is available.
>From what Doug says the facility would be useful in a working harbour or
near shipping lanes subject to fog (or smoke from bush fires in the case of
Sydney Harbour). You've encouraged me to ask our local volunteer coast guard
and see what they know about availability of triangulation information in
foggy (or smokey) conditions. Craigs description suggests the bearings are
likely to be calculated from an array of directional aerials rather than
physically rotating an aerial, which makes sense of the fast speed of
response. Last time I remember thinking about this was in early 1960's when
reading "Practical Wireless":~)

Thanks again for the information.

All the best, PeterO


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Edelman <mje_at_spamcop.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] VHF signal triangulation
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:08:36 -0400
>...  Craigs description suggests the bearings are
> likely to be calculated from an array of directional aerials rather than
> physically rotating an aerial, which makes sense of the fast speed of
> response. Last time I remember thinking about this was in early 1960's when
> reading "Practical Wireless":~)

Modern technique is to use a pseudo-Doppler array, which is a ring of 4 
or more antennas that are switched using diodes. This can give you very 
fine resolution with no moving parts.

In fact, it can be done with only two antennas, albeit with a 180 degree 
  uncertainty that can generally be resolved with two bearings.

-- mike



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:31 PDT