sullivaned_at_pop.mts.kpnw.org wrote: > I'm seeing 1600 mAH cells for half the cost of 1800s. > 'Milli-ampere hours' > implies a linear proportionality to me, so we're talking ~ > 12% difference > in burn-time? In some cases I'd rather have twice as many > cells (like for > my bike lights). As opposed to say, an EPIRB. The NiMH battery technology keeps improving. As with many things, it's most economical to buy somewhat below the current state-of-the-art, so at the moment the 1500 - 1700 mA-hr cells are usually the best deal. However I wouldn't use any NiMH cells for an EPIRB since they slowly discharge when left unused for long periods. They're fine for a month or so, but the capacity decreases substantially with longer storage. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Nov 14 2002 - 15:11:21 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:00 PDT