Re: [Paddlewise] NiMH

From: Peter Rathmann <prathman_at_attbi.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:39:23 -0800
sullivaned_at_pop.mts.kpnw.org wrote:
> I'm seeing 1600 mAH cells for half the cost of 1800s.
> 'Milli-ampere hours'
> implies a linear proportionality to me, so we're talking ~
> 12% difference
> in burn-time?  In some cases I'd rather have twice as many
> cells (like for
> my bike lights). As opposed to say, an EPIRB.

The NiMH battery technology keeps improving.  As with many things, it's
most economical to buy somewhat below the current state-of-the-art, so
at the moment the 1500 - 1700 mA-hr cells are usually the best deal.
However I wouldn't use any NiMH cells for an EPIRB since they slowly
discharge when left unused for long periods.  They're fine for a month
or so, but the capacity decreases substantially with longer storage.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Thu Nov 14 2002 - 15:11:21 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:00 PDT