PaddleWise by thread

From: Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] ACA Critical Judgment report
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:46:41 -0400
The ACA has just released a report on "Understanding and Preventing 
Canoe and Kayak Fatalities". http://www.acanet.org/CJintro.htm

Here in Connecticut we have recently fought off another attempt to 
require registration and mandatory boating classes for all manually 
powered boats, including canoes and kayaks. At a recent meeting the 
state Department of Environmental Protection stated that it is their 
intent to eventual install a system of mandatory boating certification 
for all canoeist and kayakers. People will have different opinions on 
the wisdom of such a system, but it is likely states around the country 
are considering similar programs

The ACA report details the safety issues involved and discusses the 
variables that effect safety in small boats. I have not read through 
the whole report yet, but it appears to be the most complete report yet 
to investigate specifically the safety issues related to canoes and 
kayaks.

As kayaking becomes more and more popular the chance that governments 
will seek to regulate the sport will increase. The ACA report should 
give those interested in seeing regulation handled in a reasonable way 
some good information to work with.
Nick Schade

Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
USA
Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Gary J. MacDonald <garyj_at_rogers.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] ACA Critical Judgment report
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:42:18 -0400
Dave Kruger wrote:

> The chance that a befuddled paddler (even on a WW river) will hurt someone
> else with his/her craft is pretty slim -- so the rationale here is similar
> to that for helmets for motorcycle riders (or, in Oregon, under-16 bicycle
> riders):  using the headgear reduces expensive and debillitating head
> injuries, reducing the overall cost of health care.  Which we all sort of
> "share" whether protected by our own health insurance or not.  I don't like
> being told I have to wear a helmet if I ride a mototcycle, but I do see the
> stake we all have in making sure head injuries are minimized.

Not at all to defend the types of registration usually attempted, but...

WW paddlers at crowded playspots have been known to ram each other, but 
a real problem is creating a dangerous situation for the friends or 
guides or paddlers-by who try to rescue the unknowing newbie or the 
casually clueless.  It also helps prevent greiving relatives syndrome.

In the Litigous States of America, everyone in any way involved might 
face liability.  A legal entrepreneur might launch a suit naming 
equipment mfrs, adjacent landowners, landowners allowing access to 
put-ins, any regulatory or rescue authorities, previous guides or 
instructors, paddling companions, etc etc.  I presume there are 
precendent excluding some of these, but not all.

GaryJ
-- 
Director, Family Canoeing Centre
Recreational canoeing courses for the whole family.

         +--------------------------------+
         | /"\                            |
         | \ /                            |
         |  X  ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN      |
         | / \ AGAINST HTML MAIL & NEWS   |
         +--------------------------------+

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] ACA Critical Judgment report
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:39:16 -0400
On Thursday, April 17, 2003, at 10:42 AM, Gary J. MacDonald wrote:

> Dave Kruger wrote:
>
>> The chance that a befuddled paddler (even on a WW river) will hurt 
>> someone
>> else with his/her craft is pretty slim -- so the rationale here is 
>> similar
>> to that for helmets for motorcycle riders (or, in Oregon, under-16 
>> bicycle
>> riders):  using the headgear reduces expensive and debillitating head
>> injuries, reducing the overall cost of health care.  Which we all 
>> sort of
>> "share" whether protected by our own health insurance or not.  I 
>> don't like
>> being told I have to wear a helmet if I ride a mototcycle, but I do 
>> see the
>> stake we all have in making sure head injuries are minimized.
>
> Not at all to defend the types of registration usually attempted, 
> but...
>
> WW paddlers at crowded playspots have been known to ram each other, 
> but a real problem is creating a dangerous situation for the friends 
> or guides or paddlers-by who try to rescue the unknowing newbie or the 
> casually clueless.  It also helps prevent greiving relatives syndrome.
>
> In the Litigous States of America, everyone in any way involved might 
> face liability.  A legal entrepreneur might launch a suit naming 
> equipment mfrs, adjacent landowners, landowners allowing access to 
> put-ins, any regulatory or rescue authorities, previous guides or 
> instructors, paddling companions, etc etc.  I presume there are 
> precendent excluding some of these, but not all.

The attempts to register rarely have any intent to protect paddlers 
already committed to the sport. Regulators are not concerned about 
unruly WW paddlers trying to get one more ride on a nice wave. About 
half the fatalities are in calm water. Regulators want to protect the 
decides one day that they want to paddle across the lake, capsize and 
drown. Boating safety education would not be able to teach committed 
paddlers anything, they can only hope to teach the casual paddler a few 
simple ideas that might save their life: Wear a PFD, Don't stand up, 
Don't paddle in high water unless you know exactly what you are doing, 
etc.

The goal of any regulation would be to protect those people who 
otherwise would not have a clue. I think it is worthwhile that these 
people get the information they need, I am just not convinced that 
mandatory training is a reasonable way to do it.

Nick Schade

Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
USA
Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Gary J. MacDonald <garyj_at_rogers.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] ACA Critical Judgment report
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 12:04:03 -0400
Nick Schade wrote:

> The attempts to register rarely have any intent to protect paddlers 
> already committed to the sport. Regulators are not concerned about 
> unruly WW paddlers trying to get one more ride on a nice wave. About 
> half the fatalities are in calm water. Regulators want to protect the 
> decides one day that they want to paddle across the lake, capsize and 
> drown. Boating safety education would not be able to teach committed 
> paddlers anything, they can only hope to teach the casual paddler a few 
> simple ideas that might save their life: Wear a PFD, Don't stand up, 
> Don't paddle in high water unless you know exactly what you are doing, etc.

Agreed.  The serious boaters get caught in the regulatory crossfire 
because a newbie gets hurt doing something the experienced paddler 
thinks is just a fun warmup.

> The goal of any regulation would be to protect those people who 
> otherwise would not have a clue. I think it is worthwhile that these 
> people get the information they need, I am just not convinced that 
> mandatory training is a reasonable way to do it.

As a regulatory analyst in my day job, I agree here too.  For a 
mandatory course to cover the legal arse of the giver, it has to be 
several hours long just to tell a paddler what any of us could tell a 
friend in 15-30 minutes at water's edge.  There is a need for a 
rock-bottom-intro course that is very short, and open to all who might 
wanr or need it.

GaryJ

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:33 PDT