PaddleWise by thread

From: Matt Broze <mkayaks_at_oz.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] ACA Report and Nick's Rec Boat Scenario
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 23:44:14 -0700
Brian Blankinship
ACA Open Water Coastal Kayaking Instructor wrote:
<Snip>>>>>>My concern is that the ACA is representing itself rather than
paddlers.  As a
sea kayaker who does not do whitewater, I would like to see the statistics
broken out.  I have not seen the report but I bet the majority of accidents
are either whitewater or alcohol related.  My point is despite recreational
kayaks being the fastest growing group, I doubt that is where most accidents
are.  By promoting this type legislation, ACA is promoting a requirement for
people to take their courses.<<<<<<Snip>

I'm glad someone finally made this point. I'm kind of surprised it's coming
from someone who is part of the ACA system though. But, will they let you
keep your certification after revealing the organization's secret motives? A
good rule of thumb with any organization government or even individual would
be to look at what motive they may have that would increase their income or
power if enacted. I personally hate set in stone requirements imposed on
others, but Scott's idea of making "Deep Trouble" mandatory with every kayak
sold somehow appeals to me. Let see now, I make roughly $.60 or $.70 each
time a copy is sold and that new law should definitely substantially raise
my income from it above the $1200 a year income (I'm now paying income tax
on) because of it. First let my check my royalty contract concerning the
movie rights before I decide if a mandatory video of Deep Trouble should
come with each kayak sold.;-)
BTW, Brian, congratulation on getting your stolen kayaks back.

Nick Schade is also snipped: <<What is the easiest thing to teach a casual
paddler so he or she can deal with a capsize...A casual paddler will not
take
the time to practice sophisticated self rescue techniques...If you had his
attention at a demo for 3 minutes, what would you show the guy that could
potentially save his life? >>

Three minutes for a demo. Okay, I'd put him in his own kayak with what he
wears for kayaking, then shove him over, when his head surfaces again I'd
tell him that if he can't get most of his body out of cold water in the next
2 and a half minutes (and if the shore wasn't within a hundred yards or
less) that almost certainly he would quickly become incapacitated and
probably die from drowning or (if he brought a PFD) exposure or drowning.
Let him spend what remains of the three minutes without any guidance trying
to get his body up out of the "cold" water. He should have learned a lot by
then. Most importantly, that it was a real good thing the first time he
capsized, and failed in his attempt to deal with it, happened in a
relatively safe place.

As for Nick's fat fisherman capsizing when out fishing in a Pungo with no
bow flotation, at least his fat will help insulate him longer against the
cold. If I could talk to him but not help him, I'd tell him to stay calm and
focus on what he must do, which is to get himself out of the cold water as
soon as possible. About the only way I can see that he might succeed in
doing that is to get the kayak as level as he can and pull himself up the
ramp of the deck (or hull) while straddling the kayak belly down. If he can
get his trunk out of the water he must then do what he can to help stabilize
the kayak so he doesn't fall off it again. Given that the Pungo doesn't come
with sponsons (if he did have sponsons he might be able to use them for bow
flotation--either internally of externally and he wouldn't be in such a
predicament), he might try leaving his legs spread out and feet dragging in
the water as far out to each side as he can put them. That would still leave
his arms free and the kayak relatively streamlined so he might hand paddle
it to the easiest shore to reach. Since wind may be a factor he also needs a
way to judge if he is making any progress so he should line up two sets of
landmarks about 90 degrees to each other to see if he is making good
progress in his chosen direction or fighting a losing battle. If he finds
himself rolling over back into the water he should probably next try to lay
over the kayak's remaining flotation perpendicular to the length of the
flotation compartment so he doesn't fall off as easily.

If I were in this fisherman's position, I'd try to pull and  push the stern
(flotation end) of the Pungo down until the kayak was level and then I'd try
to rotate the kayak while still pushing down at the stern until the cockpit
edge broke the surface, hopefully allowing the water in the bow to drain out
as I pushed down more on the stern. If that worked I'd quickly twist the
kayak right side up after having drained most of the water from the bow.
With a wide kayak like the Pungo I'd probably next try to do a cowboy rescue
over the stern. Pulling myself forward with my arms (while straddling the
kayak belly down with my legs well spread apart in the water with my big
feet in the water acting like rocker-stoppers) until my hips were over the
seat. At that point I'd quickly lift my chest off the deck rock back and
drop my butt down into the seat. With the big cockpit it should be easy to
then bring my feet in especially if I still had the paddle to brace with. If
I had lost my paddle I'd hand paddle over to pick it up and then paddle back
to shore. If it was real windy and I had still managed to dump the water out
and right the kayak, I'd next try to fashion a paddle float from something
(including my PFD--if nothing else was available).

I've never tried dumping or reentering a Pungo, with or without bow
flotation, so I don't know if either of the above proposed methods would
have much chance of success with that particular kayak.

Matt Broze
http://www.marinerkayaks.com


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jim Holman <siguiriya_at_attbi.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] Nick's Rec Boat Scenario - on TV?
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 07:36:29 -0700
Matt writes:
Three minutes for a demo. Okay, I'd put him in his own kayak with what he
wears for kayaking, then shove him over, when his head surfaces again I'd
tell him that if he can't get most of his body out of cold water in the next
2 and a half minutes (and if the shore wasn't within a hundred yards or
less) that almost certainly he would quickly become incapacitated and
probably die from drowning or (if he brought a PFD) exposure or drowning.
---------------------------------------------
Here's an interesting piece of information.  Around the country there are a
large number of cable access stations.  Cable access stations provide
training and all equipment necessary for making a TV program, typically for
free or for a very minimal charge.  Equipment basically includes everything
that that you would need for a TV production -- cameras, audio, studio,
editing, graphics, the whole enchilada.  Depending on the access station,
you may even find that there is high-quality digital equipment available.
Also, it is often possible to obtain cable access staff assistance on TV
productions.  And many stations maintain lists of volunteers who are willing
to help out on other people's shows.

So let's take the idea of the demo that you mention above -- and instead of
a demo for one person, you capture the moment on a video camera, and turn it
into a cable access TV program.  If you are particularly ambitious, you
could get some grant money to cover the costs of distributing the program
around the country to other cable access stations.  That way your program
plays not just on one station, but around the country.  You also could
distribute the program on the internet, charging a small fee to cover the
costs of copying and distribution.  You could send a copy of the program to
every kayak and canoe shop in the country.  You could send a copy to every
high school in the country.

To be honest, a cable access program is not going to have 30 million viewers
every night.  But if your distribution is wide enough there will be some
hundreds of thousands of viewers who will eventually see it.  In fact, you
would be surprised at the numbers of people who would see it.  For example,
I was on a cable access program a few years ago.  This was a program
targeted at the hispanic community, and dealt with relations between the
anglo and hispanic communities.  I figured no one will ever see this thing.
Well, for the next year people at work came up to me saying , "oh, I saw you
on TV last night.  You were saying something in Spanish."

The cable access system makes it possible to make a reasonably high quality
TV program at almost no cost.   There is some time required for the TV
production and editing, of course, but we're not talking about a huge amount
of time either.  You also have to do some planning and script writing up
front in order to figure out what's going to be on on the program.  But all
of these activities are basically free or of extremely minimal cost.

When your program is done, the only hard costs are the costs related to
copying and distribution.  This is where the grant money comes in.  But --
since the program itself cost almost nothing to make, you only have to beg
for money to copy and distribute.  So instead of having to ask for $100,000
for production costs, you ask for a few thousand for copying and
distribution.  If you make copies at the access station, then your only hard
costs are the video tape, packaging, and mailing.  So to distribute a copy
of the program is probably under $10.  A $10,000 grant puts a thousand
copies of your program around the country.  I don't know if the ACA would be
interested in something like this.  If you're really ambitious you can line
up sponsors, who for a mention in the program credits, help to defray the
costs.

jim holman



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Joan Spinner <jspinner_at_peoplepc.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Nick's Rec Boat Scenario - on TV?
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:23:23 -0400
There is a difference between making a warning video and an instructional
video. If we can scare enough people we most certainly will invite a law to
make people feel safe, like driving laws <G>. Show people a solution to the
problem and you have something to show everyone.





Maybe I'm overly optimistic but I think a lot of people who go into surplus
stores, WalMart, where ever, to plunk out a few hundred bucks for a boat may
well be willing, at that moment, to watch a short video on kayaking, as long
as you don't call it safety. How many of you have read the safety info from a
PFD? I suspect most of us think we already know safety and just flip through
the booklet to see if anything looks "interesting." Safety is boring. I like
Nick's senario. Show that but show some way out. No store trying to make money
will show something that scares their customers. 





Joan





<<Matt writes:


Three minutes for a demo. Okay, I'd put him in his own kayak with what he


wears for kayaking, then shove him over, when his head surfaces again I'd


tell him that if he can't get most of his body out of cold water in the next


2 and a half minutes (and if the shore wasn't within a hundred yards or


less) that almost certainly he would quickly become incapacitated and


probably die from drowning or (if he brought a PFD) exposure or drowning.


---------------------------------------------


Here's an interesting piece of information.  Around the country there are a


large number of cable access stations.  . . .


So let's take the idea of the demo that you mention above -- and instead of


a demo for one person, you capture the moment on a video camera, and turn it


into a cable access TV program.  . . . You could send a copy to every


high school in the country.


. . .








***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:33 PDT