Even if the incident occurred as your friend described, it is not sufficient to establish your friend's assertion that the policy set by Idaho's government is to prohibit without exemption airborne search and rescue for downed aircraft in restricted areas. First, your friend failed to set out the statute, regulation or written policy that he alleged prohibits without exemption airborne search and rescue for downed aircraft in restricted areas. Second, even if one person had stood in the way of a search, it is a hasty generalization to conclude that the government's policy is to prohibit searches in such circumstances. Third, hurling mud at environmentalists is no more than an ad hominem attack. Fourth, labeling environmentalists as terrorists and then accusing them of not valuing human lives is setting up and knocking down a straw man, for it first distorts environmentalism, and then attacks the distortion. Fifth, given your friend's utter lack of independent, authoritative and verifiable cites in support of the allegation that it is the Idaho government's policy to prohibit without exemption airborne search and rescue for downed aircraft in restricted areas, and given the utter lack of logic demonstrated by your friend in his fallacious reasoning, his conclusions should be given the weight they deserve. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Wed Jun 04 2003 - 21:15:52 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:07 PDT