Peter Treby Wrote > Thanks to Peter Chopelas for showing that > high aspect ratio paddles are more efficient. > Why don't all long distance paddlers use them, G'Day Peter, Peter and Paddlewise, If you're paddling at sea and with so many shapes and sizes of people and boats, so many idiosyncratic but effective paddling styles and the infinite variety of sea states, is it possible that chaos reigns and there's no fixed answer? For example I choose a short paddle with long blades because: - 1. It maximises my bodies ability to efficiently do work over long distances. 2. Its slippage through the water is forgiving at the end of a long trip when tiredness might make me forget to closely link my upper body and shoulders, so I avoid tendon injury. 3. The long blade and short shaft let me use broken vertical paddle strokes to keep the boat (a Pittarak) moving straight in a following sea. On the other hand if there is going to be a lot of surf involved I'll choose a low aspect ratio paddle because I can roll better with it and my high aspect ratio paddle is not as strong. I'm guessing that many people will have different but equally valid ways of optimising their person/boat/sea efficiency and that physics and biophysics are not the most important issues when at sea. I'll bet a decent bottle of red that they are important for racing on flat water though. All the best, PeterO *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Jun 10 2003 - 03:08:09 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:07 PDT