Skimmer, please provide more information regarding the methodology of your comparison of the two paddle lengths. It is not clear to me just what you were comparing and how you did the experiments. I'm not even sure we are using the same definition of "work". It is my understanding that it takes the same amount of work to move the same boat the same speed through the same water (no matter how you propel it) so unless you were measuring the work at your hands or the paddle shaft you should expect to get the same results from the same boat. While there may well be small differences in efficiencies due to things like how off center the blade is with each stroke and the amount of decelleration/accelleration variations between the paddles the most noticeable difference to the paddler is likely to be one due to the different "gear ratios" being used. It is my understanding that to climb a given hill on a bicycle takes the same amount of "work" whether you are in high or low gear or whether you go up a steep slope or a shallow one to get to the top. I think your choice of paddle length is a major indicator of which gear you like to paddle in. You seem to prefer the high gear, few strokes but more strain on each stroke, approach (to an extreme that almost no other paddlers share). When trying to paddle fast, I hate even an eight foot long paddle. I can hardly imagine dealing with a nine footer. All that increased strain on my body makes me slow down even with the eight footer in order to lower the stress on my muscles and joints with each stroke. Physically, I don't feel that pain is made up for by the fewer strokes I have to take to get there. Having paddled with you back in 1984, I know you can really make a kayak move even with that nine foot paddle you were using even back then. If what you were testing was how fast you could go with each paddle, the factor making the results nearly the same is likely to have been the hull speed of your kayak because large differences in power make little difference in speed at that speed. Using a very long kayak, perhaps a racing double, one that you can't reach its hull speed with solo, might well display a greater difference in top speed between the two paddle lengths (if what you were comparing was your top speed between the paddles or your racing effort time over a given distance). Also, consider your decades long familiarity with the longer paddle to be another possible confounding, at least until you have gained many paddling hours with the shorter paddle and feel completely at home with it. I can recall loaning faster kayaks to racers that actually lowered their relative ranking (they lost to a few paddlers they could usually beat) over a given course when compared what it had been with the slower kayak that they were intimately familiar with. If they continued to use the faster kayak they soon could beat a few of the guys who had previously consistently beaten them. It takes awhile to get used to what is new and different and learn to use it to best effect. These speculations may all have been completely off base, but please provide us with more details on your tests so I can try understanding them again once I have more information and less supposition to work with. Matt Broze www.marinerkayaks.com *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri Jun 13 2003 - 05:57:41 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:07 PDT