skimmer wrote: > >For me, the only issue of interest concerns > > whether or not one paddle or another allows the engine driving the > > boat at some constant speed for some fixed distance to do so with > > greater efficiency. This is exactly the right question to ask. > >That means doing less work with one paddle than > > with another to achieve that constant speed over the fixed distance. > > > Exactly right again. > > > Do you believe that such a difference, if it exists, will be > > detectable? > It is easily detectable. I have just done an experiment with the following paddles, all of which I have owned for many years and all of which I am used to: A 216 cm Descente, big blade paddle, a 230 cm narrow blade old style Werner Little Dipper, a 231 cm AT bent shaft paddle. I paddled the same distance with each at a hard but comfortable pace without looking at the watch until I finished. The distance was about 4 nautical miles and my time for each trial was 50 minutes, plus or minus 1 minute, or an average slightly over 4 kts. I did not try to match the times; it just turned out that way. Results? I was far more tired using the 216 Descente than either of the other two. It was not a subtle difference, but dramatic. The AT was also clearly more efficient than the Little Dipper, but the difference was not that dramatic. Someone else, with a different body type, different techniques would probably come to different conclusion. But there is no doubt in my mind that anyone trying a similar experiment would easily determine which paddle was most efficient for him. Jerry *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sun Jun 22 2003 - 11:44:54 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:08 PDT