Re: [Paddlewise] Down VS Synthetic

From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 12:39:58 -0700
I have owned and used both types, but have never used a down bag in a coastal
climate paddling environment.

I agree with the synthetic folks on the better suitability of synthetics in a
rain forest environment.  Plus, it is just not very cold, even in winter, in
the temperate forest-clad slopes of BC, WA, OR (or CA).  Inland paddlers have
perhaps a good rationale for down when the air temp dips into the 'teens and
lower.

I've ski-toured with a down bag (a lot!) and though it works well in our wet
mountains (Cascades and Olympics) for a one- or two-nighter, on longer trips
body moisture and tent condensation reduce the effectiveness of down
substantially, whether using snow shelters or tents.  Drying a down bag in
our mountains is a laughable proposition -- when is there a dry, sunny day?
Again, in an inland climate with very low humidity, down would be a
reasonable choice.

All bags lose loft with successive compressions -- so store yours
uncompressed.   And, retire the sucker when it's no longer thick enough!  My
down bags lasted much longer than synthetics, FWIW.

Lastly, no one has addressed the issue of cost:  there, synthetics win hands
down (yuck!).

--
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Thu Sep 25 2003 - 12:40:05 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:10 PDT