PaddleWise by thread

From: <jkayak_at_sopoint.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Waterproof Digitals
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:27:01 -0500
>They say it is water resistant, not waterproof and resolution is only 3.2 
>megs. 
>
>Not really that great if you want quality pictures. 

Kirby,

Not sure if I agree with the above. 3.2 MP is more than enough to take
great photos providing the camera is high-quality. According to all that
I've read about digital photography, unless the aim is to produce prints
larger than 8"x10", an increase in pixel resolution is hardly discernible.
Of course I'm not a professional phtographer. 

I have been using a Canon A70 w/ marine case while kayaking throughout the
summer. I have found the quality of pictures to be excellent. The camera
has been easy to use and comes with quality software. It also offers a
great deal of manual control, although I must admit that I most often use
the automatic setting. 

The one drawback of this camera for paddling is size. It's a bit larger
than the smaller compacts and when inside the marine case just doesn't seem
to fit anywhere. 

That said, another size factor to consider is that some people are just not
able to comfortably use the smallest of the cameras (especially while
paddling.) The Canon S400 is an excellent camera but I didn't feel
comfortable holding it in one hand (which was one of my criteria). 

The Canon marine cases can be had for less than $200.

Regards,
Jeff
jkayak_at_sopoint.com
http://mail2web.com/ .
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Donald Schoengold <schoengold_at_earthlink.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Waterproof Digitals
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 16:49:19 -0800
[Moderator's Note: Content unaltered. Excessive quoting (including  
headers/footers/sig lines/extraneous text from previous posts, etc.) 
have been removed. Please edit quoted material in addition to removing 
header/trailers when replying to posts.]

>Jeff commented:
>According to all that
>I've read about digital photography, unless the aim is to produce prints
>larger than 8"x10", an increase in pixel resolution is hardly discernible.

This may be true as long as you do not use your photo editing software to do
any cropping.  If you crop your pictures to improve them, the required pixel
count can increase significantly.

DON
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: WhiteRabbit <whiterabbit_0117_at_charter.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Waterproof Digitals
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 16:09:46 -0600
[Moderator's Note: Content unaltered. Excessive quoting (including  
headers/footers/sig lines/extraneous text from previous posts, etc.) 
have been removed. Please edit quoted material in addition to removing 
header/trailers when replying to posts.]

When you are grabbing shots in a moving kayak framing isn't always what you
would do on dry land with a tripod.   Usually you grab a larger image than
what you really want and then crop it in the computer.  The part of the
image that I actually use is frequently half or less of what I shot.  The
vast expanse of the outdoors also leads to quite a bit of cropping.  With
the 105 - 115 mm max focal length of most compact cameras it is sometimes
hard to get close enough to what you are shooting to fill the viewfinder.

That being said, I use a Canon S30 with Canon housing and have no complaints
with the image quality even after cropping.  This is a 3.2 MP camera.

Images of my backcountry Yellowstone trip on Shoshone Lake are at
http://www.siue.edu/~rwashbu/Page.html  These were all taken with the
camera.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:35 PDT