Re: [Paddlewise] Binoculars

From: Michael Daly <michaeldaly_at_rogers.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:34:22 -0500
On 13 Dec 2003 at 14:32, Blankibr_at_aol.com wrote:

> For basic kayaking (looking at landmarks, birds, nav aids, finding the
> way in/out of waterways...) should I worry about getting BAK-4 prisms
> vice Bak7?  Would a less expensive pair like the Fujinon's do well
> enough or should I spring for the Bruntons or Steiners?

Previous discussions on binocs have had folks divide into two groups -
 those that prefer the best hi-end brands and get the quality therein 
(they tend to emphasize things like nature watching and such) and 
those that prefer the cheaper and therefore less-painful-to-lose-or-
damage brands.

Personally, I prefer the latter.  I don't want to have to baby an 
expensive pair.  I have a basic pair of waterproof Bushnells (8x24) 
and find they give adequate performance in most conditions.  Not as 
sharp as the fancy ones, but adequate.  I tend to use them primarily 
as a navigation aid and occasionally for nature watch.  They are 
small and stuff into my knee tube easily.  With the neoprene neck 
strap, they float.

Last week I noticed a new(?) model in an outdoor shop - 8x42 
waterproof.  Either Brunton or Bushnell (a B name, can't remember 
exactly, probably Bushnell).  These looked like a pair to investigate 
if you want a larger pair.  With a 42mm objective, it starts to be 
useable as a low-light or astronomy binocular.  Not a bad price 
(C$150 or about US$115) - however, given the disarray in the display 
case, the model and price may not have been correctly associated.  

If you consider Fujinon to be "less-expensive", you probably prefer 
the higher-end stuff.  For basic navigation, the difference between 
BAK4 or 7 or even no-name prisms is largely irrelevant.  You'll only 
worry about these things for serious birding, astronomy etc IMHO.  
For the latter, BAK4 has been the standard for a while - if I were 
paying this kind of price, I wouldn't accept anything less.

My personal shopping list would be, in order of preference:
- waterproof
- no more than 8x magnification (unless image stabilized).
- no clipped or vignetted images (common with BAK7 or no-name)
- Coated optics
- Largest aperature objective without being too bulky.
- rubberized or similarly toughened, so I don't worry about
  cosmetic scratches and stuff.
- high res optics.

Mike
PS - I also don't like monoculars.
PPS - this response has been un-crossposted, since I don't subscribe 
to the other list.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Sat Dec 13 2003 - 12:33:09 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:11 PDT