Just my thought but: >It seems entirely proper to: 1) inform those paddlers of the controversy; We've been informed. >2) suggest a means for interesred paddlers to express their views to Subaru; It has been suggested. >3) make the case that taking such action is: a) feasible, and b) desireable. Case made. Now, on to topics more directly paddling related - like... the relative merits of sweep vs C to C rolls? on-deck storage bags - step towards death or great idea? or raisins vs no raisins in trail mix? :o) *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Feb 03 2004 - 14:34:12 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:11 PDT