RE: [Paddlewise] ACA abandons conservation & advocacy!!!

From: Steve Brown <steve_at_brown-web.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:55:48 -0800
Sean,

We agree on several things but not all. Specifically, I'm willing to bet we
agree on most issues that are truly paddle related.

I never said I don't care about the environment. Of course I do - I need it
to live! What I said was that I don't need the ACA to be worried about that
particular subject because a lot of other groups already are, and it is not
paddle centric.

The problem is the same as it was the last time it came up on this list. As
paddlers we have different views and priorities when it comes to
conservation. Aside from not wanting to paddle in oil slicks, we all have
very different views of how natural resources should be managed and used.

For example, I am not at all concerned with keeping people off of beaches in
Central CA to protect the nesting sites of the Snowy Plover, but I am very
concerned about protecting wetlands from development. I need wetlands to
attract and hunt ducks. I'm not saying my view is the "right" or only one,
but it is mine, its is a valid view, and I'm a paddler. (To avoid future
email banter please notice I did not say that I wanted people to molest
nesting Snowy Plovers, only that I did not want to keep people off the
beaches)

If the ACA sticks to paddling, they can really represent paddlers in the
areas of education, access and (non) regulation. I'm guessing they can do a
good job of that for most all of us. On the subject of conservation the
results of previous email wars on this list indicate they cannot possibly
represent all of us because views vary so widely.

Let's stick to paddling. There are enough good arguments on that subject
alone to last a lifetime!



Steve Brown

-----Original Message-----





Every type of population and business is represented by an interest group
that advocates specifically for them.  We paddlers deserve no less.
Recreationists (if that is a word) probably have a better chance at
advancing resource conservation than environmental groups because we spend
money and politicos can't figure out whether we are Democrat or Republican.



I believe that saving rivers and lakes for paddling, wildlife habitat is for
the greater good of society.  These places provide spiritual renewal,
enjoyment and exercise opportunities.  It also means safer drinking water.
I live in the west to be near beautiful, unspoiled and wild places, if you
don't care about those things...well I can't relate.



Sean
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Thu Mar 25 2004 - 14:10:06 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:13 PDT