RE: [Paddlewise] ACA abandons conservation & advocacy!!!

From: Steve Brown <steve_at_brown-web.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:43:49 -0800
Dirty rivers are certainly a paddling issue, but "conservation" is to broad
an issue to be paddling related.
Last month the argument was about whether the ACA should associate with
Subaru because they were making a vehicle with suboptimum gas mileage. Smog
and petroleum usage don't even make the grade as tangential (love that word
now) paddling issues. My point is that "conservation" just opens the door
for a whole political agenda that some of us don't want to be a part of.
Narrow the scope to what are truly paddle related environmental issues and
my interest improves considerably.

Steve Brown
 

-----Original Message-----
.......

Don't flip, though.  Because the tea color of the water is the result of
two paper mills upstream, and if it makes contact with your eyes, your
nose, your throat, or any small cuts you might have, it BURNS.  Those paper
mills are still discharging *today* because nobody has made them stop.
They're doing it because, of course, it would put a serious crimp in
their profits if they were compelled to treat their wastewater properly.

---Rsk
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Thu Mar 25 2004 - 20:44:02 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:13 PDT