[Paddlewise] Of Interest from Grand Canyon

From: Tom Martin <tomhazel_at_grand-canyon.az.us>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 22:30:28 -0700
Hi folks, thought you all might find the following of interest from Grand
Canyon National Park. Cheers, tom martin

Ps: You can sign up for all the RRFW Riverwires (I just post ones here on
occasion I think you all should be aware of) at

HYPERLINK "http://www.RRFW.org"www.RRFW.org. t

 

RRFW Riverwire - RIVER PLAN HITS DELAY, DROUGHT, AND COURT DENIAL May 8,
2004

 

The much anticipated release of the Colorado River Management Plan (CRMP) at
Grand Canyon National Park has been delayed yet again. In the balance is
Colorado River management for the next decade or more. Recent events may
make the outcome of this plan even more contentious.

 

In a statement released May 6, 2004, by Rick Ernenwein, head planner for the
CRMP, Ernenwein noted "It is our desire to present a comprehensive and
thorough document to the public. We are nearing completion of the Draft EIS,
which we now expect to release later this summer." The projected release
date is now tentatively set for late July.

 

Issues the Colorado River plan should address include whether or not the
park will continue to allow many large groups of concessions motorized tour
boat trips to race through the canyon, and how rafting access is to be
distributed between the parks 14 river concessions and the general public. 

 

Grand Canyon National Park announced in November 2003 the park would no
longer allow the public to sign up to raft the river on their own, citing a
backlog of over 8,000 do-it-yourself permits pending to raft the canyon.

This spring, the Grand Canyon river concessions are offering sizeable
discounts, hoping to fill empty bookings for 2004 and 2005, even going so
far as to offer discounts to repeat customers.

 

The CRMP is supposed to address the distribution of use between the river
concessions,  which presently hold access to over 80% of river visitation,
and the general public. Kevin Lewis, president of American Whitewater,
comments "The average citizen can no longer even apply to wait 20-plus years
to access their National Park while river concessionaires offer discounts to
fill their spaces. Where is the equality in this?"  

 

The stakes for access between the river concessions and the boating public
have never been higher. On April 19, 2004, an opinion was finally rendered
by New Mexico District Court Judge Martha Vasquez overseeing a lawsuit
filled by a number of river runners in 2000 over the allocation of use
between the rafting public and the parks river concessions. 

 

In Judge Vasquez's opinion, she denied all the river runners' claims but
one, in that she ordered the park to complete a comprehensive review of the
river management plan. John Wells, lawyer for the plaintiffs, notes "We are
very disappointed with this decision and are weighing our options. I
strongly suggest all boaters participate in the comment period for the new
draft plan and that they inform their own congressman and senators about the
issues." 

 

Issues between river runners about who gets to go are only part of the
equation, as drought continues to grip the southwest. Present forecasts
indicate there may not be enough water in the river to float the thirty
seven foot concessions tour boats that travel through the rocky river
channel. By 10 year contract, three out of four river concessions trips use
this type of large motorized watercraft. John Weisheit, Colorado River
Keeper from Moab Utah, notes "Rafts will still be able to go through Grand
Canyon, but the big motorized tour boats will get stranded in the rapids,
just like in the summer of 2000 when the park had to use helicopters to lift
concessions passengers off their stranded motorboats." Park planners are
also considering shortening river rafting trip lengths for the general
public. Low water flows caused by the drought will slow the speed at which
oar rafts travel. This will make it more difficult to raft through the park
in a shorter time frame if trip lengths are reduced. "It will be interesting
to see how park planners address low water levels in the CRMP" notes
Weisheit.

 

"Given what's at stake in this management plan" notes Tom Martin,
Co-Director of River Runners For Wilderness, "it's of utmost importance that
river runners and wilderness lovers let their voices be heard in the
upcoming comment period. It's time to end the commercialization and
wilderness value destruction occurring in this icon park." 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Tue May 11 2004 - 18:34:35 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:14 PDT