Carey Parks wrote: > I think you missed my point. If, for whatever reason (lack of good reasoning?) one feels they must have something on deck that might compromise a re-entry, then why not consider it expendable and if one does swim (which we're trying to avoid but didn't, just like we tried to avoid the deck load in the first place but didn't) So if it's expendable....then why take it in the first place?!!?!?? Shawn *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue May 18 2004 - 07:45:05 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:14 PDT