Doug wrote: >>>>>You mean you almost forgot to say you sell one of the few sea kayak lines that incorporate a sliding seat arrangement, namely Mariner Kayaks. :-) Just ribbing you Matt.<<<<< Actually, as far as I know a sliding seat/footbrace unit has always been unique to Mariner kayaks. Can anyone correct me here? Peter Treby asked about failures with the sliding seat. With a few of the very first ones I did, I didn't use heavy enough slide rails for the seat track and the seat could be torqued out of the soft track (mostly during rolling practice in a heated pool when the vinyl was softened some more by the heated water). I feared the weak spot might be the nylon bolt that slid in the footbrace tracks and for a few years supplied spares with every kayak sold. My fears were unjustified. In 23 years only about a half dozen nylon bolts have ever been broken (that I'm aware of). I'm probably aware of almost all of them since the nylon bolt is not an item commonly available at the hardware store so I get the call about where to get them. We shipped them new units free of charge immediately. A few of the earlier foot pedals we got from other kayak companies eventually work hardened when used by racers who trained a lot and broke where the aluminum was stressed at 90 degree bends. I designed the present ones (from 3/16" extruded angle) because while only a few had failed I didn't want any failures. I don't recall any of the new foot pedals ever breaking. I also worried about the glue joint holding the slid tracks to the hull and still go to what some would say are extreme measures to make sure they stay down when I install them (and I believe have personally installed every sliding seat we have ever made). The only one that failed was one where I was trying out a new glue, so used it on our new demo. We soon learned not to start using this glue (Spray 90) due to others experience because it was not waterproof with long immersion. I forgot about it and sold this demo kayak several years later and it failed a few years after that. No other track I put down (all of them in the kayaks we sold) has ever, to my knowledge, come up over the last 23 years. We had to stop our builder from selling any sliding seat Mariners (when NWK sold some wholesale in the 1980's) because some their employees gluing the tracks down so poorly they were coming up in the showroom. Other companies in the early 1980's tried holding the seat down in the kayak the same way (but never fastened the seat to the footpedals). So many were coming up I had to call them up to tell them how to do it right because their failures with a similar looking system were reflecting on what we did even though none of ours had ever failed. I was relieved when other manufacturers dropped this way of holding their seats down. I understand Eddyline is faced with a similar situation regarding thermoformed kayak competitors right now. Peter said about Paul Caffyn: >>>>>He reckons a rudder gave him increased daily mileage.<<<<< It might well have, some kayaks have more need for rudders than others. However, perception and reality can often be two different things. Until we get some objective measured results with many different kayaks using both a rudder and not using a rudder (by paddlers equally competent both ways) we don't have good data, only opinions. One of the problems is that having to make course corrections in difficult conditions is a lot more noticeable than extra drag due to the rudder and dragging it at an angle to make corrections. Further, all this is very kayak dependant and skill dependant as well. I know rougher conditions always gave me a big advantage in races. How much of that was do to skill on my part in rough conditions and how much was due to not having a rudder (or a kayak that handled them well without) I can't really tell. A lot of folks will tell you they know something by their own experience but they don't really. I know John Winters has commented on this several times in the past. Peter worried about a stern heavy trim causing lee helming. This is not likely to be a worry with a heavy camping type gear load (even if its only an overnight trip) because there is then enough mass in both ends to not let them get blown around much. Most kayaks weather helm so much already that it is hard to correct with just a change of trim to the stern. With kayaks that don't weather helm you probably ought to store the first 10 to 20 pounds in front of ones feet (if there is a possibility of extreme winds blowing off shore anyway) but after that the next 40 pounds should go into the rear so you won't induce weather helm unnecessarily with a bow heavy trim. Lifting the kayak to test the balance only works with light loads and/or strong backs. I'm usually very lightly loaded (day trip) or quite heavily loaded (overnight and longer trips) there doesn't seem to be much middle ground. Matt Broze www.marinerkayaks.com *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Jun 22 2004 - 21:34:09 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:15 PDT