PaddleWise by thread

From: Evan Dallas <evand_at_pensionresourcegroup.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] Laser flares; strobes; most bang-for-the-buck
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 12:22:57 -0700
As long as we're on the subject of flares, there was some discussion a while
back regarding laser flares.  The literature claims they can be seen up to
20 miles away and can last up to 72 hours on a set of batteries.  _If_ these
perform as well as advertised, it almost seems like they could make other
flares nearly obsolete (but on the other hand, what ever works as well as
advertised...).  Does anyone on the list have experience with these who
would care to comment on the efficacy of the laser flares vs other types?
They seem to cost around US$100, but if they work well that could be a
bargain.

Secondly, strobes usually get high marks for attracting attention.  The
problem I have is that I've only seen two types:  The first is the fat red
one (I'm not even sure of the brand, except is says "Emergency Strobe" on it
and is made in China) that accepts one large D-cell battery, where the flash
(when it works) is quite bright, but the quality control seems to be lacking
and they can, or perhaps more accurately, _usually_ just stop working all of
a sudden.  The second type is the skinny type that takes a single AA cell
battery.  Mine is made by Princeton Tec and the quality control seems much
better, but the flash is much less bright.  Does anyone have a
recommendation for a nice bright _dependable_ stobe?

Lastly, would anyone care to rate the various devices in terms of their
ability to get attention from a distance?  Like let's say you've got a
limited budget and just want to get the most bang for the buck, given that
sometimes the attention to want to get could be overhead (like from a
helicopter) and sometimes from a boat at a distance or in the fog or at
night, etc.  Obviously the most effective device will depend on the
circumstances, but given that you can't always know the circumstances in
advance, you've just got to make your best guess.  So, we've got:

Pencil, 12 guage and parachute flares;
Laser flares
Smoke bombs
Dye marker
Strobe lights
Mirror reflector
Reflective tape
Reflective streamers (<-- I forget what these are really called)
VHF radio
Cell phone
EPIRB
and probably others I've missed.

Whaddya think?  From my perspective, I lean towards including all the cheap
stuff (smoke, dye, mirror, tape, streamers), plus the strobe and vhf and
MAYBE the laser flare.  I've generally carried handheld flares, but I'm
starting to think these are less effective than some of the other options.

Evan Dallas
Woodinville Washington
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Keith Wrage <keith.wrage_at_charter.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Laser flares; strobes; most bang-for-the-buck
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 14:58:56 -0500
Not much direct info - two types of strobes on this page:
http://www.lcflight.com/flashlights.html

I have the strobe/flashlight combo.  Hasn't failed yet in a couple of years 
of testing.  Don't particularly like the fact that the flashlight and 
strobe use the same batts - prefer to have emergency equipment as a 
stand-alone.  I don't use the flashlight routinely - carry an LED light for 
usual light needs.

K
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jim Farrelly <JFarrelly5_at_comcast.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Laser flares; strobes; most bang-for-the-buck
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 16:46:17 -0400
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Keith Wrage" <keith.wrage_at_charter.net>

> Not much direct info - two types of strobes on this page:
> http://www.lcflight.com/flashlights.html
>
> I have the strobe/flashlight combo.  Hasn't failed yet in a couple of
years
> of testing.
 > K

I have had the same strobe (strobe only model) for four years.  I change the
battery every six months & lube the switch once a year with silicone.  Works
well.
That  laser mentioned is tempting.  Wish I had the money.  Perhaps Kirk
could buy me one to test for the group. It would be an honor.

Jim et al
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: William Jennings <will_at_bigwoodenradio.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Laser flares; strobes; most bang-for-the-buck
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 16:13:41 -0500
ACR makes strobes for the marine environment.
Their Fire-Fly and other products are used by many who
make their livings on the water.  They also make military-issue
versions of the firefly that are more suited for SAR situations in 
combat
(IR and blue filter shields for more covert signaling & so your rescuers
don't mistake your strobe for weapon muzzle flash...).

I have been packing a Greatland Laser rescue Laser Flare
in my bailout bag & when I go backpacking or wilderness traipsing.
It's not a 'flare' that 'broadcasts' 'all at once' the way a pencil or 
parachute flare,
or even a smoke flare can do...it is used to sweep signal an area or a 
specific 'target'.
Unlike a laser pointer, whose beam stays focused as a 'point', the 
laser flare
expands in an ever widening straight line. Sweeping a passing plane or 
helo
should flash their crews.  It can also 'flash' reflective material from 
great distances.
I like mine. It's compact, rugged, and and extra measure of safety. 
Their website
explains function and use quite well.

That said, my PFD 'wears' an ACR Sea Strobe, and I often pack a Firefly 
strobe
in my quickly-grabbed gear or in bail bag. There is a firefly version 
that is water activated
and most kayakers would probably want to avoid these, even tho they can 
be set up to
not water-activate.

-Will

ps. I do not sell these items, make no sales-related claims, etc.
Those interested can Google both ACR and Greatland Laser if so inclined.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Laser flares; strobes; most bang-for-the-buck
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 17:08:53 -0400
On 5 Jun 2004 at 12:22, Evan Dallas wrote:

> The literature claims they can be
> seen up to 20 miles away and can last up to 72 hours on a set of
> batteries.  _If_ these perform as well as advertised, it almost seems
> like they could make other flares nearly obsolete

They suffer from one serious flaw - flares can be seen from any 
direction whereas these laser flares (if they are what I'm thinking 
of http://www.mssltd.com/laser/) have to be pointed at a potential 
rescuer.  They really shouldn't be called flares.

> Secondly, strobes usually get high marks for attracting attention. 
> The problem I have is that I've only seen two types:  The first is the
> fat red one (I'm not even sure of the brand, except is says "Emergency
> Strobe" on it and is made in China) that accepts one large D-cell
> battery, where the flash (when it works) is quite bright, but the
> quality control seems to be lacking and they can, or perhaps more
> accurately, _usually_ just stop working all of a sudden.  The second
> type is the skinny type that takes a single AA cell battery.  Mine is
> made by Princeton Tec and the quality control seems much better, but
> the flash is much less bright.  Does anyone have a recommendation for
> a nice bright _dependable_ stobe?

I use the PT (with lithium battery) and the other you mention are the 
only two I've seen.  There is an orange version of the red one sold 
by the folks that sell the C-light (aka see light or sea light).  I 
don't know if it's the same manufacturer.

> Pencil, 12 guage and parachute flares;

Probably 12 guage are best !/$, but it's a biggish package to carry 
in a PFD pocket.

> Smoke bombs
> Dye marker

These two are cheap and reliable - except for high wind and high 
current/confused seas respectively.

> Mirror reflector

For the price, probably one of the best sunny day items.  Nights and 
cloud make them almost useless (unless the rescuer is shining a light 
at you.

> Reflective tape

Put it on the kayak regardless.  Ditto on your PFD if it's an older 
one that doesn't have already.

> VHF radio
> Cell phone

Both are good in certain areas and worthless in others.  It all 
depends on coverage.  VHF is better in that everyone can hear, 
whereas the cell phone limits you to one person.  Cell phone is 
cheaper in the sense that so many already have one.  I know that many 
parts of Georgian Bay have better cell reception than downtown 
Toronto, so I always bring mine there.

> EPIRB

$$$ and slow.  They'll get to you, but it could take a while, 
depending on where you are.  If you're paddling in the middle of 
nowhere, they are probably the best solution.

> and probably others I've missed.

Big international-orange plastic bag.  They are easier to find in the 
US and Britain than in Canada and have handy instructions on them on 
how to use them for rescue.  You can inflate them (with help from the 
wind) and you have a big flotation aid as well as very visible 
object.  You can get in it for warmth (including an emergency bivi).  
Stretch it over a pit to make a solar still for drinking water etc.  
Does everything but walk the dog.

Matches in a waterproof container.  You could make three little smoky 
fires if you get to shore.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Rcgibbert_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Laser flares; strobes; most bang-for-the-buck
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 17:01:59 EDT
In a message dated 6/5/2004 12:25:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
evand_at_pensionresourcegroup.com writes:


> As long as we're on the subject of flares, there was some discussion a 
> while
> back regarding laser flares.  The literature claims they can be seen up to
> 20 miles away and can last up to 72 hours on a set of batteries.  _If_ these
> perform as well as advertised, it almost seems like they could make other
> flares nearly obsolete (but on the other hand, what ever works as well as
> advertised...).  Does anyone on the list have experience with these who
> would care to comment on the efficacy of the laser flares vs other types?
> They seem to cost around US$100, but if they work well that could be a
> bargain.
> 
I carry one made by Greatland in a pfd pocket. I left it in there during a 2 
day surf class and it is extremely watertight. The batteries are rated to 15 
hours. In daylight it is quite bright on axis, off axis it is not. At night it 
is awesome. This is something that plagues all directional light sources. 
However, the perception of the person seeing it is of a staccato flash. A flare of 
any type is omni-directional, and thus one of sufficient candela and height 
is potentially more visible.

What does the person(s) think of the laser signal seen? Does it register as a 
distress signal at all? The laser signal will never be higher than the height 
of the swells one paddles in. 

It columnates light well. Some folks carry flashlights to pinpoint a position 
for a rescue. The laser serves that function very well. As a signalling 
device for the kayaker flying into a destination where flares cannot, it adds more 
value.


>  Mine is made by Princeton Tec and the quality control seems much
> better, but the flash is much less bright.  Does anyone have a
> recommendation for a nice bright _dependable_ stobe?

Mine is a P Tec, too. At night it works well. Too bright and the vertigo 
effect takes hold. Police officers sometimes train at a firing range where a 
strobe light is activated to replicate conditions at night where lights are 
activated and shots fired. I would consider too bright a strobe in rough water to be 
a possible detriment to staying upright. I do not consider the red R2D2 
looking strobe to be too bright, just a bit bulky.


> 
> Lastly, would anyone care to rate the various devices in terms of their
> ability to get attention from a distance?  Like let's say you've got a
> limited budget and just want to get the most bang for the buck, given that
> sometimes the attention to want to get could be overhead (like from a
> helicopter) and sometimes from a boat at a distance or in the fog or at
> night, etc.  Obviously the most effective device will depend on the
> circumstances, but given that you can't always know the circumstances in
> advance, you've just got to make your best guess.  So, we've got:
> 
> Pencil, 12 guage and parachute flares;

Parachute's are a 10 out of 10; 12 guage are a 5 out of 10; Pencils are a 2 
out of 10. I only carry them as a person mounted flare device.

> Laser flares

As a primary signalling device 2 out of 10. when seen as a signalling device 
and a homing in device I find them at least a 6.

> Smoke bombs

Good in daylight.



> Dye marker


Good in daylight. Would it last long in rough water?

> Strobe lights

Good at night, in non foggy conditions.

> Mirror reflector

Good in sunshine.

> Reflective tape

I need more of this on my boat.

> Reflective streamers (<-- I forget what these are really called)

Mylar? I've never used them. Could be good for a shore marking position for 
an evac.

> VHF radio

10 out of 10 if it's submersible, charged up and within range of a vessel or 
a listening station.

> Cell phone

I was surprised that they worked at Cape Flattery and Shi Shi beach on the 
Olympic National Park coastline last week. They work in many places in 
Washington state.

> EPIRB

I don't own one but the size and weight of them is so attractive now I may do 
so in the future.

> Whaddya think?  From my perspective, I lean towards including all the cheap
> stuff (smoke, dye, mirror, tape, streamers), plus the strobe and vhf and
> MAYBE the laser flare.  I've generally carried handheld flares, but I'm
> starting to think these are less effective than some of the other options.
> 
If I were to choose 3, it would be the VHF, parachute flare and the laser. 
Just a humble opinion.

Rob G
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: John Kirk-Anderson <jka_at_netaccess.co.nz>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Laser flares; strobes; most bang-for-the-buck
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 23:23:03 +1200
Hi all,

Check out <www.equipped.com/rescuelaser.htm> for info on laser flares, and
their other pages for really good info on signalling.

I have trialed a Greatland Laser Flare and found it took a bit of careful
aiming to ensure my observer saw it clearly. I doubt I could be that
accurate with my nose just above the water. The observer said it was very
bright, and would have been a good homing device, but didn't register as a
cry for help in the way that a flare did.

A former USAF Para-Rescue Jumper who I have paddled with said that he used
to carry a radio, Day-Night flare (see Pains Wessex website), strobe, and a
signal mirror, as his means of attracting attention. As PJ's deploy into
hostile seas by choice, I followed his recommendations.

Re strobes, I have seen them from the air at night a few times, and they
stand out like the proverbial.

Once I asked an observer on a SAR aircraft what worked for them, and he
replied that the thing that stood out most on one search for the crew of a
sunken vessel was a floating aluminium ladder! The swimming survivors then
fired a para flare, which passed between the engine and the fuselage of the
Orion P3. That got their attention.

Cheers

JKA


-- 
John Kirk-Anderson
Banks Peninsula
NEW ZEALAND
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Doug Lloyd <dalloyd_at_telus.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Laser flares; strobes; most bang-for-the-buck
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:14:05 -0700
Michael posted:

>> VHF radio
>> Cell phone

>Both are good in certain areas and worthless in others.  It all depends on
coverage.  VHF is better in that everyone can hear,
whereas the cell phone limits you to one person.  Cell phone is cheaper in
the sense that so many already have one.  I know that many
parts of Georgian Bay have better cell reception than downtown Toronto, so I
always bring mine there.<

My old cell phone was crapping out occasionally, so I picked up a new one
last week in anticipation of time on the water and in the hills this summer
(kayaking, hiking, mountain biking). The store had one Motorola Star-Tac
left in analogue only. I don't need the features of a digital cell phone, so
got the older analogue design (small flip phone). My old Motorola was very
large. The smaller unit should be easier to carry at all times, better
battery. I went for the analogue on recommendation, as the loggers and
fishers have been buying them up, unhappy with the digital performance in
fringe areas. I figured I'd get one while I still could. Anyone else had
experience with digital/ analogue differences?

Doug Lloyd
Victoria BC
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Laser flares; strobes; most bang-for-the-buck
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 00:38:15 -0700
> (kayaking, hiking, mountain biking). The store had one Motorola Star-Tac
> left in analogue only. I don't need the features of a digital cell phone,
so
> got the older analogue design (small flip phone). My old Motorola was very
> large. The smaller unit should be easier to carry at all times, better
> battery. I went for the analogue on recommendation, as the loggers and
> fishers have been buying them up, unhappy with the digital performance in
> fringe areas. I figured I'd get one while I still could. Anyone else had
> experience with digital/ analogue differences?

I wouldn't tell about The Island, but on the mainland Telus seems to have
the best digital coverage.  My model is *very* old Nokia ( 4 yrs or so),
dual-mode, i.e. it switches by itlself to analogue mode when I'm beyond
digital range.  It is not a flip model, and I'm not sure, how flip-model
work with Aquapack bag.  Before that I had a digital-only model.  The
difference was that it had weaker reception in elevators, undeground
parkings etc, and didn't work in fringe areas at all - but this was 4 years
ago, fringe has moved farther since then.
PS: Re: Flares - how long is their shelf life? Day-Night flare/smoke, fore
example, costs USD50 - does it mean an additional annual expense?
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:37 PDT