Many opinions and some fact follow: If a design feature of a kayak is truly distinctive and functional, it should be patentable. If it is patented, it is protected (in the countries were patented). That system seems to basically work in other industries so why not the kayak industry? This has the added benefit of allowing the designer to specify what it is about his boat that is his - that is - provided someone else hasn't already patented the same feature and that the idea is not already in public domain. If a design has already been in the public domain without a patent, it cannot be protected. For example: I would guess that the hard chine stern, rounded hull bow, and integral skeg of the Mariner boats would have been patentable when invented. It is quite distinctive and functional. I think the only reason more companies haven't copied it is that it lends itself best for use by skilled kayakers who can edge their boats, etc. That narrows the market and it seems that most manufacturers are trying to widen their products appeal. Matt: Did you patent it? If not, my limited understanding is that you are relying on the good will of others to protect your work. Is copying a boat design "moral"? Webster says: 1 relating to, dealing with, or capable of making the distinction between right and wrong in conduct 2 relating to, serving to teach, or in accordance with the principles of right and wrong 3 good or right in conduct or character; sometimes, specif., virtuous in sexual conduct 4 designating support, etc. that involves approval and sympathy without action 5 being virtually such because of its effect on thoughts, attitudes, etc., or because of its general results !a moral victory" 6 based on strong probability !a moral certainty" 7 based on the principle of right conduct rather than legality !a moral obligation" 8 Law based on general observation of people, on analogy, etc. rather than on what is demonstrable !moral evidence" Of course, I "copied" that text. The argument against copying unpatented work would seem to revolve around definition #7. Even then, however, there must be a "principle" of what is right. Principles of conduct come from "rules". I would say, what are the rules in the kayak industry? In my industry, copying is the norm, as is adding value of your own. If you want to protect your work you have to patent it and even then we look for legal loopholes. Those are the rules. We follow them, and IMO, as long as we don't lie, steal, or commit some immorality to do so, copying is moral. Some do lie, etc, but that's where I draw the line. I'm very sure that lying is wrong, but copying is only wrong when rules prohibit it. In other words, copying does not violate any fundamental principle of right human conduct unless it violates some defined rule of ownership (as in the case of patent or copyright). In fact, the advancement of civilization and technology depend on copying and building on the hard work of others. Monkey see, monkey do! What are the "rules" in the kayak industry? I asked if they were, or why they should be different than any other industry and I don't think I got any meaningful answer. Duane brought up an excellent point about the Inuits and Aleutians. It may have seemed to be humor, but it cuts to the core of this issue. Rarely does anyone invent anything new. Most inventions are simply improvement of existing technology. For the most part, they're all "copies" to a degree. In order to get a patent you have to show that your approach really has new value that should be protected. No one on this list invented the kayak so it is matter of degrees and that's what patents are for. Matt: Though I haven't read every word of this thread I did read something about you guys retiring. Please don't do that! If you must though, wait till I buy a couple of Coasters for rock gardening. I'm still saving my pennies. Steve Brown *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon Aug 16 2004 - 06:07:17 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:16 PDT