On 23 Sep 2004 at 9:10, Colin Calder wrote: > We also actually do know a lot about paddles from collective > experience. Wing paddles, and greenland paddles in particular only > work effectively through specific angles of attack, which change > dynamically throughout the catch and stroke. If you fail to replicate > that complex motion (be you a tank test dummy or a novice paddler), > then they don't do very much very well. What we know about paddles is largely subjective - well, certainly for GPs and non-racing paddles. I know of many GP users who make very different assessments of their paddles after years of use. There are very different claims about cadence, efficiency etc. In a tank test, we could keep varying the parameters (such as the stroke length and cadence, the angle of attack, etc) and objectively measure the performance. If the person conducting the tests is in any way creative, they will follow a trend to see where it takes them. Aside: There seems to be a tendency among the general public to assume that scientists blindly follow a narrow path and believe everything they see. Having spent a number of years in research (both at university and in the business world), I know this is far from the truth. Given any interesting problem, a good researcher won't want to quit until they've tried everything they can think of - including some really oddball ideas. I can honestly say that the researchers I've known have been among the most creative and imaginative people I've ever met - more so than many of the artists I've known. This is backed by psychological studies that show scientists and engineers think more abstractly than artists; the latter tend to be very concrete thinkers. This is entirely opposite to general perceptions. > my argument is the only way to test the validity of > an analysis of the fluid dynamics/mechanics of a static paddle in > flowing water or a paddle stroked through air and water would be > through a comparative methodology (combined or not with an analysis of > the bio-energetics) investigating real paddlers proficient in the use > of their paddles. Another analogy - Knowing about the fluid dynamics > of a disembodied swimmers arm would tell you what? yet small changes > in the complex motion of that arm result in great changes in swimming > performance. How far apart should the fingers be to maximize the swimmer's power? A test of a disembodied arm can tell you that more accurately than any swimmer could. Once you know that, you can teach the swimmer to use it. Another example is skiers - they get in wind tunnels to measure the resistance of various body positions. This is something that cannot be done without the wind tunnel. No snow, no bumps, no screaming fans - just wind. If we want to really understand the paddles, there are several steps we need to take. One is to analyze the paddle in various flows so we can make some concrete statements about lift vs drag, performance vs angle of attack, steady state vs pulsed/dynamic flow changes and so on. Once we know that, then we can then analyze the way in which the paddle is used by competent paddlers - what is the flow vs time within the stroke. Then we can use the two groups of information to determine whether the paddle is used optimally. Both the tank and the paddler will come into the situation. One without the other is a waste of time. I think that from a point of view of complete understanding, don't jump the first step. However, the origin of this thread (Peter's proposal to estimate efficiency with cheap and dirty tests) is a legitimate step along the way. It won't tell us everything, but it could settle one argument*. Mike * and probably start another :-) *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri Sep 24 2004 - 06:31:31 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:17 PDT