cholst_at_bitstream.net> wrote: >I think we should strive to look as boring as possible. That way we are > less likely to find our favorite campsites occupied when we get there That's the ying and yang in a nutshell, isn't it? High-profile features in popular media conflict with our expectation that our favorite, quiet haunts will remain so. I bet there are few among us who have __not__ obscured the location or access for a "favorite spot." Maybe the focus on exotic locations in SK mag is good ... keeps makers of paddling goodies supplied with fresh money, and sends the buyers of said goodies off to places we ain't. [Offered tongue-in-cheek: we can't have it both ways. To maintain access to good gear, we need to have a commercial marketplace where honest folks can make a living supplying us with gear we need. If those folks can't stay in business off us, then they need to branch out ... and promote. And that is part of what is happening in what I sloppily termed glitz and dash in SK mag. The glitz and dash is part of marketing, whether I like it or not.] -- Dave Kruger Astoria, ORReceived on Tue Dec 21 2004 - 10:31:04 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:18 PDT