Someone said (snip): >I stopped subscribing to Sea Kayaker long ago. After the first two years >they started re-cycling articles< I've never found that to be entirely true, though some repetition is evident and probably necessary for economic viability. I know any time the editorial staff reviews an article that is similar to a previous one, it must offer new information or reword things to sufficiently shed new light. Personally, I'm amazed that Sea Kayaker Magazine comes out every two months with the fresh articles that it does. I keep figuring they have ran out of stuff, when in fact, new, insightful articles pop up each issue. Some probe deeper than others, but on the whole, the quality remains good to excellent. As for the layout, I liked the changes at first, but haven't made my mind up totally yet. I think it did need some change. Was it too much? Regardless, I find the magazine to be very readable and still inviting at present. I have a list of future possible submission for the magazine, but my health is still on the edge, with fibrillation slowly coming back after extensive procedures only a short while ago, so my future output energies are strongly suspect. But I can still read! Doug Lloyd Victoria BCReceived on Tue Dec 21 2004 - 22:45:53 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:18 PDT