On Dec 27, 2004, at 9:31 AM, John Winters wrote: > Doug wrote; > >> I've never found that to be entirely true, though some repetition is >> evident >> and probably necessary for economic viability. I know any time the >> editorial >> staff reviews an article that is similar to a previous one, it must >> offer >> new information or reword things to sufficiently shed new light. > > Since I wrote the comment that inspired Doug to respond I should point > out in fairness that most magazines focussing on a specific activity > do the same thing. As Chuck pointed out the magazine has to appeal to > beginners. You can't expect new subscribers to buy old issues to get > caught up. I don't consider the repetition a crime at all, I just > don't feel it serves my interests. Opinions will differ on whether > each article variant offers enough new content to make it worth > reading. > > Nick brought the subject up because he felt the tone (correct me if I > have this wrong, Nick) did not present a suitably sophisticated image > of the sport. I don't think he expected it to have the same content as > say, Marine Technology. I have no idea if a magazine with a different > focus would survive nor do I have any opinion on whether Sea Kayaker > properly fulfills a need. It has survived and I suspect that provides > a good measure of its value and success - to enough people to makemit > pay for its owners. I don't see the enjoyment of going out for a day on the water regularly depicted in the magazines. I see skills tutorials, trips to exotic locations, and short trips gone bad, but not the kind of kayaking that I suspect the majority of skilled and dedicated sea kayakers actually seek out on a weekly basis. I would like to see more attention given to paddling where all those skills that we try to learn are actually being used successfully to have a fun day on the water. What I see in the magazines is good, useful and interesting, but I think there is an aspect of sea kayaking that has been left out and that would be good for the sport for people to see. I go kayaking because I like being out on the water feeling the ocean move. I don't see it as a collection of skills to be mastered before moving on. It is not merely a way to travel around an exotic location inexpensively. It is not just an exercise in avoiding dying. I seek out places where I can experience the ocean in a way that it can only be experienced in a small kayak. I use the skills I've learned to enhance that experience. The magazines seem to depict sea kayaking as a means to some other goal not as the goal itself. I think it is a disservice to the sport to depict it as means to another end. I would like to see sea kayaking depicted as reason enough in itself to participate in the sport. So, yes, I would like to see a more sophisticated depiction of the sport. I am not critical of repeating tutorial information for beginners. I am not critical of what is depicted, but the lack of what could be depicted. I will acknowledge that what I would like to see is hard to translate to ink on paper. Nick Schade Guillemot Kayaks 824 Thompson St Glastonbury, CT 06033 USA Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847 http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/Received on Tue Dec 28 2004 - 07:04:34 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:19 PDT